Baby photo shoots c.c

[hazard]

as for the tag My photos dont have it ones the clients get the photos it has a small hz In the corner, i thought it looked on but that tag is only used on my fb page

 

[hazard]

Nah I'm def the wrong person to ask on that one.... Others who know much more about more cameras might be able to chime in on that one for ya. I would still imagine you have a little bit of wiggle room to go higher then 100. Even 200 or 400 would allow you to bump your shutter speed.

I give it a go

 

[RebeccaAPhotography]

as for the tag My photos dont have it ones the clients get the photos it has a small hz In the corner, i thought it looked on but that tag is only used on my fb page

Please dont take this the wrong way but I know others will say this a lot meaner then I am going to... Do you own a business? Do you charge for photos like these?

 

[hazard]

i didnt charge for these photos no. as they r my friend/family. but i chage everyone else and no one else has a prob with me charging

 

[jonathon94]

Are you being serious? :lmao::lmao:

Kinda

with asony the Iso tends to give the photos alot of noise any advice on that?

Shoot raw and try ISO 400-800 I imagine your sony can get decent shots with iso levels like that and you might be able to clean up the little noise that might be introduced in your photo in PP.

Being so used to a point and shoot, I was surprised how high I can adjust my ISO in my T3 without considerable noise showing up.

 

[hazard]

Are you being serious? :lmao::lmao:

Kinda

with asony the Iso tends to give the photos alot of noise any advice on that?

Shoot raw and try ISO 400-800 I imagine your sony can get decent shots with iso levels like that and you might be able to clean up the little noise that might be introduced in your photo in PP.

Being so used to a point and shoot, I was surprised how high I can adjust my ISO in my T3 without considerable noise showing up.

I do shoot RAW and i keep that in mind

 

[cgipson1]

Lose the watermark. Its way too distracting. The last one is def much more in focus and the eyes are well in focus. The better of the whole lot

I think the watermark gives it a very professional look

REALLY? When it is mostly stone cold amateurs that don't have a clue, that have the huge watermarks like this? Jonathon94.. I think you deserve a HUGE watermark just for that comment!

 

[cgipson1]

with asony the Iso tends to give the photos alot of noise any advice on that?

uh yea... buy a nikon or a canon!

 

[cgipson1]

as for the tag My photos dont have it ones the clients get the photos it has a small hz In the corner, i thought it looked on but that tag is only used on my fb page

HE SAID FACEBOOK! :lmao:

 

[RebeccaAPhotography]

uh yea... buy a nikon or a canon!

Ditto....

 

[punch]

i personally feel that the lighting is too harsh. in addition, the colors look a little clinical to me.

i would try to get some natural light going... and pull back a bit at least on some of the shots.

 

[hazard]

I asked for advice not rudenuss u might as well tell me not to bother

 

[cgipson1]

Hazard.. You are charging.. that automatically makes you a PRO, buy the very definition of the word! Since your shots are definitely not PROFESSIONAL.. I don't have anything nice to say! Even though I did make some suggestions on HOW TO IMPROVE in your "Sisters" Thread..... but you will probably ignore that anyway!

 

[MLeeK]

iv only had the lens about a week now and that shoot was the 1st one i donewith the lens. im finding it hard right now to get the focus right

It's not the lens that is the issue. It's your shutter speed.
If you are shooting hand held STILL life you can shoot no slower than 1/80
Live subject no slower than 1/125
Moving live subject (babies/toddlers) no slower than 1/250
Fast moving subjects (sports) depending on the sport? 1/320 in rare cases, but about 1/500

Anything slower than that and you will get motion blur-which you have in abundance.
I am sorry, these are NO WHERE near professional or even decent amateur quality.

As for the ISO-a little grain can be fixed in post. Blurry images can't. Learn to shoot for higher ISO's and how to post process them.

 

[jonathon94]

Lose the watermark. Its way too distracting. The last one is def much more in focus and the eyes are well in focus. The better of the whole lot

I think the watermark gives it a very professional look

REALLY? When it is mostly stone cold amateurs that don't have a clue, that have the huge watermarks like this? Jonathon94.. I think you deserve a HUGE watermark just for that comment!

lol I'm just expressing my own opinion. I'm not saying that all people should put watermarks on their photos because it's the right thing to do or whatever I'm just saying I think it looks professional