Josh, Here are some thought I had, relating to your photography. I am being totally honest, and straight-forward with you, this is not a joke in any way.
Allegorical or story-telling photography with HEAVY manipulation was very popular in the 1850's to the end of the 1870's, as serious photographers hired actors or models dressed in costume, and tried to create allegorical/mythological/religious types of scenes, sort of reminiscent of classical paintings. But that trend passed eventually, morphing into basically, the pictorialst movement of the late 19th and very early 20th centuries, with more emphasis on outdoor and natural-world scenes.
The pictorialists did a lot of manipulation, on both their negatives, and/or on their prints, and were in general, less interested in composite images made from multiple negatives than the earlier workers.
Around 100-120 years after the first phases of allegorical photography, in the late 1970's and very early 1980's, the artist Cindy Sherman engaged in a very diligent, productive phase of allegorical/story-telling self portraiture in costume, which sort of presaged the entire "selfie craze" and its literally millions upon millions of self-absorbed young female practitioners by almost three decades. Sherman made herself up and dressed herself in amazing wardrobe items, and cast herself as many entirely different persons, of diverse ages, in hundreds of artistic self-portraits, set in real-world, custom-created sets. Your work, what I have seen, seems sort of in Sherman's shadow, only thirty-plus years later, and with almost self-deprecating results. What you are doing has been done before, twice, basically a full century apart each time, but both times with very,verrry SERIOUS intent, by the very best and most-educated practitioners of both the art and the craft of photography...but the level you're operating at,currently, is extremely unsophisticated.
If you worked at it harder, you might be able to get your stuff to raise to the level of "camp", but so far, as you can see by your YouTube hit counts, people just are not "getting on board" with the approach. I'll give you what I think is the best example of you now, and where you might end up: John Waters, the film maker from Baltimore, Maryland, USA. I think the the level you're operating at,currently, can be elevated. You **might be** able to move this up a long,long way.
![[No title]](/data/xfmg/thumbnail/40/40308-f92e28f094216c151f3ad1fd7453c99b.jpg?1734174716)
