SCraig - thanks for the comment. What you said is one of my problems with photography, or, more precisely, with how photography sometimes (too many times actually) is perceived.
I perfectly understand your point of view but some sunsets/sunrises are much harder to capture than one would think. We have seen many such photos and too many people think it's all about being in the right place at the right time.
However, it is much more than that. Technique is just the most obvious thing, also critical to get a great sunset/sunrise. We all have also seen sunsets/sunrises taken in auto mode with no decisions on composition or exposure zones etc.
Besides technique and time/place, other things have to come into the right place to get a great image.
In my case this image/panorama was created from 9 vertical images and all of them had to be taken in manual mode compensating for light changes as the clouds on the right side, that cannot be seen, were moving quite fast and let the sun shine brighter or dimmer within a time frame of seconds.
Also there were speed boats running around and some veil boats too; 3 planes flew through the scene and too many ducks, gooses and other birds kept on getting into the frame frequently and almost impossible to foresee.
There are many other things to be told about how I got this image and I agree that most of them cannot be seen and understood by the viewer. And I am also aware of the fact that a great image is not necessarily an image hard to get.
However, even if it seems dull I believe this is just a superficial impression. And many other photographers must have felt like me, I'm sure.
Unfortunately there is nothing we can do other than just make the image for yourself which is always a good thing or include something "universally" interesting and easy to perceive by the viewer - and it looks that I failed to do that.