What's new

C&C

BJPhotography

TPF Noob!
Joined
Mar 2, 2011
Messages
102
Reaction score
5
Location
Virginia
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
This was taken inside by a window. Im learning the triangle and wanted to get a critique on what Im learning. This was taken with my 50mm lens set at F1.8,1/50,1000 iso. My histogram shows the exposure to being pretty close to right on but Ive learned that my histogram isnt always correct and Im wondering if its blown out around his hair and table area? I spot focused on his eyes. Advice? Thoughts? Much appreciated.

DSC_7471.jpg
 
This picture is definitely over-exposed. You're aperture is too wide, ISO is too high. The histogram may look right because of the darkness under the table. Use matrix metering.
 
Hmmm, ok. I kinda thought so too (blown out) but the histogram threw me off! Thanks. I'll try it again later. :)
 
Yes the bright parts are overexposed, but getting the exposure of the eyes right is more important than the background.

You had to use f/1.8 and ISO 1000 to have a fast enough shutter speed (1/50) to minimize camera shake.

While the composition of the photo and the overall subject matter may be somewhat mundane, I think you did exactly what needed to be done to make the photo in that situation.
 
Last edited:
Thanks. I like it cropped and zoomed in in your second edit. :)
 
First off...I would say completely forget about using f/1.8 for photographs of the boys...just don't venture i to that land of razor-thin depth of field and missed focus. At indoor ranges, f/1.8 is simply asking for pics with one eye in-focus, and the ears out. One nose in focus, one pair of out of focus eyes. At close distances, f/1.8 does not have any margin fort error. If you want shallow depth of field, indoors, you will have it with f/2.8. This shot of the boys eating their sandwiches is a cute family moment, but the over-exposure really hurts the shot. As badly as the one boy's hair is blown out, overexposed pretty badly, I think the right exposure should have been more like f/2.8 at 1/250. Getting the exposure right for the eyes?????? Not my idea of the way to approach this at all...I would say, get the exposure RIGHT for the highlights, and then use the superb shadow retrieval capabilities of a modern Nikon to "lift" the shadows "up" in post, and render the scene at the kitchen table beautifully. A simple, 5-second curves adjustment in post could have taken a much briefer exposure, like f/2.8 at 1/250, and made this shot a winner all around.
 
Thanks Derrel for the suggestions! I will keep that in mind for my next shot opportunity. :)
 
Oh, you know something, I forgot to mention: the D7000 is pretty sensitive to the TONE CURVE setting and the saturation levels the camera is set for. It might be a good idea to set the Tone Curve to LOW when shooting in this type of strong window-based sidelighting. I have not pulled a photo of yours into an EXIF-reader, but am just sort of thinking out loud. One of the things about "exposure" is that along with the in-CAMERA exposure, nowadays we also get in-camera DEVELOPMENT of our images. The development of the images is based in large part upon the Tone Curve level we as photographers set in the camera's menus. Same with the degree of saturation we set, or with the pre-set modes like "Vivid", "Direct Print", "Portrait", and so on...

With the D7000, according to those whose opinions I trust implicitly, it seems that that body tends to "over-develop" images when the Tone Curve is set higher than normal and when the image saturation is set higher than normal, so, those two areas are probably the most-critical exposure/development controls that one can set on the D7000.
 
Ive never heard of Tone Curve before. I'll have to consult the Manual for this setting. Thanks.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom