This photo is a great example of a lesson that is good to know.
As has been pointed out, there are several Rules of Thumb that should have been applied properly. And if they had?
Well, frankly it would have been a technically correct, very sharp, and very average photograph that nobody would ever look at again.
Instead, knowing when to break the rules is what counts. Ansel Adams said a couple of things that apply, first "There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs." He also claimed "There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept."
Lets be clear, your image dramatically conveys a very sharp concept about your subject. And indeed virtually every comment about what wasn't "right" would have removed some part of how that concept is conveyed! But, you did it right! Instead of a bland but rather perfect reproduction of the way your subject looks, what you have photographed instead is the character of your subject!
Given the suggested instructions by the model (about which side of her face, and regarding perspective), it seems that she might just know something about "art" herself???
I did just a small bit of poking around, and only found two of your photographs (granted there are two differenct crops of one of them). There is a good bit of interesting text though, and it supports what I see in your photography. You have a non-traditional view of composition because apparently just as some sounds may not produce the "common" effects that sounds do for most people, perhaps visual stimuli is also a bit distinctive for you? Instead of just noticing what is pleasant, your photography seems (at least with a very small sample) to seek the components of composition that are essential, rather than those which are pleasant or soothing.
The lesson is that following all the rules will make a very competent average booring photographer. Knowing when to break every rule can make you a great photographer.