It is more about photographer skill and knowledge than the camera used.
Shooting moving cars means panning the camera/lens. Panning take considerable load off the camera's AF module.
Making high quality photos of a statically displayed car usually requires knowledge of, and the equipment to do, supplemental photographic lighting.
In the example you posted the car is badly under exposed, which could have been corrected for with the addition of supplemental light, and the car is somewhat out of focus. But the background is reasonably sharp. Which indicates the depth-of-field (DoF) used was to deep and the car was closer to the camera than the near limit of the DoF and outside the range of acceptably sharp focus, or that the point of focus was behind the car instead of somewhere on the car.
I shot these last summer with a
6.1 MP, Nikon D50, which is years older than a Nikon D60, and considered positively ancient and essentially useless by the ya-gotta-have-the-latest-and-greatest crowd.
Lens: Nikon AF 80-200 mm f/2.8D 1-ring (push/pull to zoom, last made in 1997), I bought used for $320.
Experienced photographers know both indoor and outdoor lighting look bright enough to our eyes, but is not all that bright to a camera, and requires using high ISO camera settings. These were shot using the D50's highest ISO setting - ISO 1600.