Derrel
Mr. Rain Cloud
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2009
- Messages
- 48,225
- Reaction score
- 18,943
- Location
- USA
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I would fire a few frames with the lens set to f/16 or f/11 and see if the lens diaphragm is actually stopping down to shooting aperture. I mean, if f/16 at 1/1000 second is over-exposed with 400 ISO film, then my guess would be that the LENS is the culprit. As far as focal plane shutters getting sticky with age, that is not my experience. Leaf shutters, yeah, sure, but modern focal plane shutters are usually pretty reliable, although on mechanically-timed cameras the top speeds like 1/1000 often can run slow-ish, like 1/750 to maybe even as slow as 1/500.
LENS diaphragms on the other hand, can easily get sluggish, or crap out. My 35mm f/2 AF-D's diaphragm crapped out this summer....shoots everything at a beautiful f/2.0, no matter the aperture setting! So, you need to literally LOOK and see with your own eyes if the lens is actually closing down to the selected, smaller shooting apertures. Oddly, the ONLY other lens that I have owned that has had the diaphragm conk out in the middle of a shoot was a 1969-vintage Nikon 35mm f/1.4 that I owned back in the mid-1980's.
LENS diaphragms on the other hand, can easily get sluggish, or crap out. My 35mm f/2 AF-D's diaphragm crapped out this summer....shoots everything at a beautiful f/2.0, no matter the aperture setting! So, you need to literally LOOK and see with your own eyes if the lens is actually closing down to the selected, smaller shooting apertures. Oddly, the ONLY other lens that I have owned that has had the diaphragm conk out in the middle of a shoot was a 1969-vintage Nikon 35mm f/1.4 that I owned back in the mid-1980's.