Camera Shake

TheLogan

TPF Noob!
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
I've been having bad camera shake problems and can't get a solid focus on almost any pictures. I mean, they're close but it makes me bad that they're not. Is there any technique that might help me? I can't just carry a tripod everywhere, thats not convenient at all.

Or is there a lens that has better stabilization?

Help please :p

-Logan
 
ok ... 1st thought is that you are shooting with too slow a shutter speed. Remember, the typical handheld safe shutter speed is 1/ (lens focal length) -- meaning that you should be at least 1/100 sec for a 100mm lens, 1/50 sec for a 50mm lens, etc. These are averages and many people (myself included) have trouble keeping still even at these speeds. You didn't mention what camera/lens you are using.

Here are some ideas from another site:

http://www.digital-photo-secrets.com/tip/11/avoiding-shake-how-to-hold-a-digital-camera/

http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-hold-a-digital-camera

Using Your Body As A Tripod For Hand-Holding Camera Shots - AudioKarma.org Home Audio Stereo Discussion Forums
 
Last edited:
Which camera are you using now?

Got any sample pictures that show the camera shake?
 
I'm shooting a canon XS with the 50mm 1.8 lens.

here are some examples:
IMG_3171.jpg

IMG_3161.jpg

IMG_2968.jpg

IMG_2946.jpg
 
What shutter speed did you use for these images? Sorry, my work computer doesn't have a exif reader.

The EF 50mm f/1.8 II lens doesn't have Image Stabilization so the slowest shutter speed you'll want to use is 1/50 of a second. There are all kind of tricks you can try to hold the camera steady without a tripod. Try not to tense up when you shoot...keep loose and breath normally. Try to hit the shutter release during the natural pause between breaths. Keep your elbows tucked in.
 
oh okay, that make sense I believe these were taken at 1/20 or 1/30 so that might be the problem. Do Image stabilization lenses drastically help? If so is there one you would recommend in the $500 range?
 
Get a tripod and a head. Will allow the slower shutter speeds and no shake.
 
Image stabalisation, at least for Nikon only helps at a max of 3 stops. Its great.. but not really worth 500bucks. Try getting a monopod. Its cheaper and a little more friendly to use than the fullsize tripod.
 
oh okay, that make sense I believe these were taken at 1/20 or 1/30 so that might be the problem. Do Image stabilization lenses drastically help? If so is there one you would recommend in the $500 range?
I can only think of two IS lenses for under $500...the EF-S 17-85mm f/4.0-5.6 IS USM and the EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM but I really wouldn't recommend either since they're not very fast lenses.

What ISO did you shoot these images at? It looks like you like to shoot in low light without flash so you'll have to use a wide open aperture, high ISO setting and try to keep the shutter speed up to keep camera shake to a minimum...or bring a tripod with you...or try these shots with flash.
 
so would buying an external flash be my best bet? would I be able to get the same natural look that most of these have while using a flash? I hate the internal flash on the camera
 
You hate it because it's direct. Whether or not you use it to help freeze motion, flash in an invaluable tool at one's disposal that opens a whole new world of lighting possibilities. If you know what you're doing, it's entirely possible to get a natural, or nice and purdy soft light with external, off-camera flash.

What f-stop are you shooting at in these images? Wide-open, the EF 50mm f/1.8 is a little soft, and DoF becomes razor thin when you're focusing in close.

Also, an addendum to the 1/(focal length) rule of thumb: You need to account for the fact that you have a crop sensor as well. This rule of thumb is thus: 1/((focal length)*1.6) .
 
so an external flash wouldn't help the problem?
 
EXIF of the above images, top-to-bottom:

1. 1/50s f/3.2 ISO200 50mm

2. 1/50s f/3.2 ISO200 50mm

3. 1/400s f/5.6 ISO200 200mm (eh?)

4. 1/250s f/5.6 ISO200 300mm (huh?)

According to the EXIF data, the last two weren't shot with the 50mm.

Flash will help freeze motion to an extent, but I'm not convinced that your problem is with camera shake. The first looks pretty sharp.
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top