I will never recommend this lens to anyone. The focus is slow, noisy, and inaccurate in low light. Build quality is embarrassing, here is a photo of a friends lens after he extended a simple collapsible hood.
<img src="http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=39554"/>
Go for the 1.4![]()
I have had this lens (the 1.8) for a while on my rebel 2000 and have no complaints whatsoever. It is amazing for the money. Your friend must have gotten a defected one.
Maybe, but it's not uncommon for this lens to end up in two pieces.I will never recommend this lens to anyone. The focus is slow, noisy, and inaccurate in low light. Build quality is embarrassing, here is a photo of a friends lens after he extended a simple collapsible hood.
<img src="http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=39554"/>
Go for the 1.4![]()
I have had this lens ( the 1.8 ) for a while on my rebel 2000 and have no complaints whatsoever. It is amazing for the money. Your friend must have gotten a defected one.
I think most know what we're getting into when they go the the nifty fifty route. How many out there are sitting at a particle board and plastic laminate desk?

For the money, it's pretty much impossible to beat - you will not find a better lens for less money.
What's a better $100.00 lens?