Hi there,
I am brand new, so I'm really sorry if this has already been posted. I did a little searching, and I couldn't find anything (It could just be my ineptitude to search). I am in the market to upgrade to an upper level dslr or 'prosumer' body, and I'm having issues resolving between these two cameras. I really want to just pick up a used 12.8 5d (not mark ii) on ebay and use the remaining coin to pick up some L Series glass I've been eyeing. But, I'm wondering if there will be a significant difference in image quality between a full frame 12.8 megapixel sensor or a cropped 18 megapixel sensor. My gut says that I'd be fine with a used 5d. I won't be doing any enlarging for commercial uses etc, and I feel like the extra size of the full frame would be really nice. I primarily will be taking this body on hikes etc and using it for landscape shots. However, it will also get tossed in my bag for everyday use too. Any opinion or guidance is much appreciated!
Thanks,
-w
I am brand new, so I'm really sorry if this has already been posted. I did a little searching, and I couldn't find anything (It could just be my ineptitude to search). I am in the market to upgrade to an upper level dslr or 'prosumer' body, and I'm having issues resolving between these two cameras. I really want to just pick up a used 12.8 5d (not mark ii) on ebay and use the remaining coin to pick up some L Series glass I've been eyeing. But, I'm wondering if there will be a significant difference in image quality between a full frame 12.8 megapixel sensor or a cropped 18 megapixel sensor. My gut says that I'd be fine with a used 5d. I won't be doing any enlarging for commercial uses etc, and I feel like the extra size of the full frame would be really nice. I primarily will be taking this body on hikes etc and using it for landscape shots. However, it will also get tossed in my bag for everyday use too. Any opinion or guidance is much appreciated!
Thanks,
-w
