Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L vs. Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8

lkWinnipesaukee

TPF Noob!
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
Has anyone compared these two lenses side by side? I have the Sigma and was thinking of "upgrading" to the Canon L lens. How do they compare in terms of color, contrast, sharpness, etc? How do the AF motors compare? Does anyone have side-by-side examples?


Thanks!
 

Sideburns

TPF Noob!
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
2,796
Reaction score
0
Location
Windsor, Ontario
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
The Canon is better, but to upgrade? I dono man...I probably wouldn't...

Why not widen your arsenal first... Maybe a 300mm or something...
 

YoungRebel

TPF Noob!
Joined
Oct 31, 2007
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
Location
Hollywood,CA/Hamburg,DE
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
yes, wanted to tell you to go with the canon, but then I saw that you already own the sigma ;)

Stay with it! It's a lot of money for the big one...and IF you upgrade one day to the canon, then go with the f/2.8 IS version...

I just tried it and imo it is just too big&heavy for my purposes, but the IS is the same size and "just " 250g heavier....

But like sideburns said, why not widen your arsenal for a prime or so....
 

Garbz

No longer a newbie, moving up!
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
9,713
Reaction score
203
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Website
www.auer.garbz.com
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
The canon will give you a noticeable improvement in the far end. The question is if it's worth the money. My guess probably not.
 

Sw1tchFX

TPF Noob!
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
7,499
Reaction score
478
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
A 10-22 or another strobe would probably be more useful than a marginal (at best) difference in quality.
 

soylentgreen

TPF Noob!
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
735
Reaction score
2
Location
Miami, FL
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
Unless there is something you are missing because of the Sigma, stick with it and get something else. Yes, the L does outperform its Sigma counterpart, but that's the reason for the price difference. Any gain in performance is probably only marginaly noticable. At best you gain edge performance usually, better IQ wide open, better CA and the like. But the % of gain might not be worth the upgrade.
 

JIP

No longer a newbie, moving up!
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
3,019
Reaction score
2
Location
Pittsburgh PA
When I saw the title for this post I was going to come on and say "are you kidding?!?!" but really, if you already have the Sigma save the dough and get another lens or a flash or....... in photography there is always some other place to throw your mony I am sure if you have a grand or more burning a hole in your pocket you will have no problem spending it.
 
OP
L

lkWinnipesaukee

TPF Noob!
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
Sounds good. I'll hold onto the Sigma.

I need a new walkaround lens, so that is next on my list. Then, by baseball season, I want to get a 300mm f/4L (or a 300mm f/2.8L. Yah, right.).

I also need about 3 more jobs. :)
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Top