Not trying to defend bad technique, but some explanation of the photos is probably in order. These pictures are not trying to show of the cars. The general theme of the series was to try and put the cars where I thought that they belonged, doing what they do best.
1. This was the first car I shot. I was going for Sunday afternoon drive look. The owner was in a hurry, so I get one pass to shoot the photos. I wanted to try an a pan, and the fast shutter speeds lacked any of the feeling I was going for. I will continue to work on my technique, no arguments from me on that. How can I get the sky to come out more? It seemed to be unnatural in blue tone, so I bumped it down a bit with the rest of the background to make the car come out a bit more.
2. I had a bit of a history as a street racer- I have "correct" shots of this car, but I wasn't looking to show off the car, I was looking for the picture that brought out the best emotional response from me. It takes me right back to the two lane blacktops I used to race on. The cars we raced were never that nice, but I digress- I was probably to personal in my selection of this photo from the set. The sun flare seems to be a love it or hate it. I liked it, so I kept it. My bad on the cutoff.
3. No land speed racer complains about a crystal clear sky. Not great for photography, but God was the racing good that day. This was a candid shot at 5 am.
4. I said I was trying to shoot the cars where they belonged- the buick would go no farther than making it to the driveway, so I figured it belonged there. Does anyone have any thoughts on how a head on shot with the car still in the garage would have looked?
5. I regret this one. A lot. I don't know what I was thinking when I selected this from the much better photos of the car and background.
Note- none of these are a square crop- click the original size button to the proper aspect ratio.