What's new

Christina

Given the... gravity of this situation, I am inclined to reply... Cans. That its all.
 
Insert sound of Homer Simpson drooling here.
 
some weird shadowing around the mouth and edge of a nostril. similar on the field shot with the mouth kind of looked like she had just shaved off a mustache. mascara still looks messy it isn't a close up hard to tell.
like this better than the field shot. Too much bleached out in that for my taste, buildings in background, her back was bleached out, well and what looked like a over lip shadow. This isn't bad, some I noticed the eyebrow start looking a little too wide and pronounced. Better than the field pic kind of like this one.
jmo
 
Gay ^^^^



haha kidding ;) mostly, much love
well. I don't have any issues getting laid, so when I look at photos of women i'm not just looking at the tits.
 
Gay ^^^^



haha kidding ;) mostly, much love
well. I don't have any issues getting laid, so when I look at photos of women i'm not just looking at the tits.

Right, you're looking at their personalititties
just trying to give a honest cc really. if she was totally nude with a dildo shoved in her, I would still look at the mascara and the shadow and look around at the entire frame.
 
well. I don't have any issues getting laid, so when I look at photos of women i'm not just looking at the tits.

Right, you're looking at their personalititties
just trying to give a honest cc really. if she was totally nude with a dildo shoved in her, I would still look at the mascara and the shadow and look around at the entire frame.

Lmfao best reply all month

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
on that note. the doggy pose in the field shot was more provocative imo. the rest of that shot beyond the pose just wasn't working out for me. This one is more hum drum but seems cleaner.
jmo
 
Nice shot. Pretty woman. Good lighting.
HATE the blue background.
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom