Come check out my photo's

[thusdon84]

for more photos visit : https://www.facebook.com/pages/Photos-By-Timothy-D-Hudson/454645914566107

 

[Majeed Badizadegan]

:banghead:

 

[Tuffythepug]

Did you really need two separate posts asking us to go to your facebook page an look at your pictures ? really ? And then what ? do you want comments and critique ?

 

[PhotoWrangler]

..

 

[480sparky48 48]

No thank you.

 

[MLeeK]

Let me explain a little here:
We don't really like external links for several reasons:
1. Usually we have no clue where it's going to and that is not cool-yours isn't a big problem there, but there are those of us who are NOT facebook happy people. A lot of people are not facebook happy people
2. it takes us out of the forum and takes up time to look through. Now your stuff may be amazing and you could be the next ansel adams, but in most cases we aren't going to go there because there is a whole lot to get through in the little bit of time we spend on here. We are going to back right out and go on to the next post.
3. If you are asking for critique of any sort an outside link is a PITA. It takes time to cc images and flipping back and forth through an external site and here takes even more time. There are a LOT of people here asking for CC and we only have so much time to give. Not that we have anything against you, but you just aren't going to get the time given to you if we have to jump through hoops to help you. You're getting help here free of charge, you kinda have to make it as easy as you can make it.
4. We're not going to critique a ton of images. We prefer 3 to 5 posted IN the thread and numbered. If you have a ton of stuff to look at you are going to just get some very generic blah blah blah. However if we have a few images that we can spend that same amount of time on you are going to get a whole lot more detailed help from the people here.

So, my suggestion is if you want someone to take a look at your work and say anything about it: post a few images and try again.
Welcome to the group!

 

[snowbear124 55]

I'm confused by your use of the possessive case of photo. Which of your photo's characteristics do you want us to check out -- subject matter? Technical or artistic aspects?

Did you really need two separate posts asking us to go to your facebook page an look at your pictures ? really ? And then what ? do you want comments and critique ?

Why, don't you know the more it gets posted, the more peeps will check it out!

..
View attachment 17976

Careful - a post like this wrought the ban hammer.

 

[PhotoWrangler]

Careful - a post like this wrought the ban hammer.

What?

 

[snowbear124 55]

There was a bit more involved. I can't find the original, but here's the aftermath:
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/photo-themes/292768-meme.html

 

[thusdon84]

Sorry I'm new to this

 

[SCraig]

See my post in your other thread.

 

[480sparky48 48]

See my post in your other thread.

Which one? There's two others.

 

[Bitter Jeweler]

I'm confused by your use of the possessive case of photo. Which of your photo's characteristics do you want us to check out -- subject matter? Technical or artistic aspects?

Did you really need two separate posts asking us to go to your facebook page an look at your pictures ? really ? And then what ? do you want comments and critique ?

Why, don't you know the more it gets posted, the more peeps will check it out!

..
View attachment 17976

Careful - a post like this wrought the ban hammer.

No. It didn't.

 

[SCraig]

See my post in your other thread.

Which one? There's two others.

If it ain't in one it's in the other

 

[snowbear124 55]

No. It didn't.

I stand corrected - I guess I misunderstood it all.