NateS
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2007
- Messages
- 2,750
- Reaction score
- 39
- Location
- Missouri
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
If you're not going to go over ISO 400, the D2x is a great camera.
But except for the body characteristics, the D300 is better in every way.
Do yourself a solid and go for the D300, or D90+good lenses.
I wouldn't say that at all. The D2x will be superior in image quality at base iso. For a macro shooter like myself, this makes the D2x a very serious consideration. I have often considered unloading my D90 to get a D2x with the base ISO IQ being one of the bigger reasons. I've even talked with a macro shooter who moved from a D2x to a D300 and somewhat regrets the decision. I think he'd probably buy a D2x again if he wasn't wanting to go full frame...and of courser full frame is where the D2x finally gets beat.
I will agree that in most situations a D300 would be a better choice, but for those of us that shoot base iso most of the time the D2x might be worth a closer look.