deja

[white]

 

[redtippmann]

vu? But nice picture of a tree....looks spooky.

 

[Bitter Jeweler]

Love it!

I really like what you've been doing.

 

[white]

Love it!

I really like what you've been doing.

Thanks. I lucked out with the fog. I don't get to see it that often.

 

[Markw]

It looks incredibly grainy to me. Something I could have done without. I like the concept though.

Mark

 

[Raizels]

I would have loved it if I hadn't seen the "drive north" post. I liked that one better.

 

[Rudha]

i agree with mark the noise is a tad bit distracting but nevertheless i like the image ....i like most of your work :thumbup:
~cheers

 

[Markw]

Can I ask what equipment youre shooting with? Ive looked at alot of your earlier posts and theyre all about the same esthetic, look-wise, not subject-wise. I like alot of them.

Mark

 

[flyingember]

I wish there was a bit more detail. less grain would help with this

 

[white]

Can I ask what equipment youre shooting with? Ive looked at alot of your earlier posts and theyre all about the same esthetic, look-wise, not subject-wise. I like alot of them.

Mark

Canonet QL17 GIII rangefinder most of the time, or a Minolta SRT-202 and 50mm lens. Everything I've posted here was shot on ilford hp5 and developed at school in the same chemistry. I think it's Sprint developer. <shrug> I've never heard of it before.

I don't mind the grain so much. I think it's because I printed them very small and scanned them at 600 dpi. I don't know, though; I'm not very computer savvy.

To be honest, there's not a lot of sharp detail in this negative. So ... minimizing the grain isn't going to make it super sharp or anything.

Thanks for the feedback. Appreciate it.