What's new

Do I really need 45mp

I have to wonder how many lenses that can actually rock that much resolution from that sensor.all those pixels are a total waist for just posting on the net and I certainly wouldn't want all that resolution just to crop it away.I still would take A D850 and not change a thing on how much i crop away which would be little as possible. IMO 24 MP is a sweet spot and more then enough for most things.
Truthfully? I haven't shot a play this year. Just didnt feel like it. I havent shown any photographs at a show in over a year. Most i do is for myself and revolves a lot of photos of my kids. I turned down family portraits recently (i kinda suck at them anyway) not into it . I could probably not even have a camera at all my phone shoots 16 mp and Raw which is good enough for any standard print. I dont shoot wildlife, dont crop much.
 
The market is currently saturated with used FX lenses...99 percent of the Nikkor lenses made since 1959 cover full-frame...there are loads of cheap DX lenses, but as I said, the HUGE majority of lenses Nikon has made have always been full-frame-covering lenses. There are plenty of used Nikon full-frame cameras on the used market.
 
The market is currently saturated with used FX lenses...99 percent of the Nikkor lenses made since 1959 cover full-frame...there are loads of cheap DX lenses, but as I said, the HUGE majority of lenses Nikon has made have always been full-frame-covering lenses. There are plenty of used Nikon full-frame cameras on the used market.
Yeah but i want to pay $200 for the $1500 lense so i encourage everyone to switch over. More saturated the better. Maybe they start giving them away,
 
Umm no not buying anything except the Panasonic GX9 for street and travel.
Never knew about them. But looks like a nice little camera. Street is fun, where i live not so much (surrounded by trees ). Any real difference between the 85 and the 9?
 
Do you mean the GX85 GX9 or the G85 or G9
Think it was gx85. When you brought up the 9 i was trying to figure out bang for buck on prices
 
Less than $600 with a 12-32. Tilt , touch, 4k

Whats the catch?
 
I have the GX85 already excellent Image quality 16MP but the GX9 though not much different few feature's i want the GX85 don't have like the L Mono Chrome D plus the AF-S AF-C MF switch on the body vs in menu of the GX85 and has the Cinelike D and Cinelike V profile for video plus the tilting EVF that may come in handy.
 
There no catch it was released in 2016 the GX9 replacing it.
I never knew panasonic had $3k cameras. They are much more a part of the market than i was aware of. Over 20 mp, tilt screens. They actually competitive.
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom