gsgary
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 16,143
- Reaction score
- 3,004
- Location
- Chesterfield UK
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Orwo UN54 again
I agree. I like 3 & 4, especially 4. 2 has potential but its so dark I want to see either more of it or substantially less to make it "eerie"Honestly I like only 3 and 4. #2 would be amazing butthis and the others lack sufficient light for a good photo. The shadows are just too dark with lost detail.
2 was shot at 1/10 hand held not much chance of getting more detail, I got the detail I wanted for a themeI agree. I like 3 & 4, especially 4. 2 has potential but its so dark I want to see either more of it or substantially less to make it "eerie"Honestly I like only 3 and 4. #2 would be amazing butthis and the others lack sufficient light for a good photo. The shadows are just too dark with lost detail.
edit- I also wish 3 was straightened-
Shooting iso 100 in churches at the speeds these were taken at hand held is not easy I only went inside because it was pissing down with rainHonestly I like only 3 and 4. #2 would be amazing butthis and the others lack sufficient light for a good photo. The shadows are just too dark with lost detail.
Over here you can have both at the same time, how do you think we get rainbows[emoji3]I know, Gary, that you did, what was possible inside the church. But rain ? On the other shots it looks like a full sun. :scratch:
Honestly I like only 3 and 4. #2 would be amazing butthis and the others lack sufficient light for a good photo. The shadows are just too dark with lost detail.