KmH said:
This is the kind of dry, arcane, useless information the world wide web is FILLED with...useless technical regurgitations and almost jack squat about how to "do" photography. Even the portraiture segment sucks.
I would suggest instead of wasting your time, that you buy a used, two-cent John Hedgecoe photography book off of Amazon, and pay the $4.98 shipping charge for the book, and then look through the entire book, at its 350 to 400 pages and its 950 to 1,100 illustrations and charts and diagrams, and get some
education about "photography", rather than filling your head with nearly useless technical babble about sensors and pixel wells and quantum efficiency and fill factor and anti-aliasing filter arrays and other nonsense--and learn some basic terms like normal lens, wide-angle lens, telephoto lens, perspective, apparent perspective distortion,front light,side light, shadows, highlights, contrast, fill light, focusing, depth of field, how to FIND light, how to POSITION your camera in relation to the light, how to position the SUBJECT in relation to the light on-scene, how to SEE pictures, and how to COMPOSE a fricking image.
The Digital Photography Tutorials site is trotted out so often, but you know what? It's really LAME, and it has been built more to show off the author's knowledge rather than to educate, to teach, or to show. The portrait examples...a couple of computer-generated faces? LMFAO...
Put the camera on Programmed Auto, and get a Hedgecoe book and
learn photography, not what the computer does, not how the electronics in the camera work.
You want to learn about photography? Get some books written by actual photographers, not internet geeks.