Ballistics
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2011
- Messages
- 3,781
- Reaction score
- 633
Why, thanks for adding more confusion. :mrgreen:Just to add some confusion: in film photography term "perfect exposure" does not exist. There is only an approximation of an exposure.
Why does perfect exposure not exist ? Its when the brightest pixel is almost at its maximum. I would have thought thats a quite well defined state.
Um.Sure, Buckster. Everyone thinks of the numerical designations for apertures as the denominator of a fraction, ESPECIALLY newbies. Denominators, for reference, are dumb and go backwards. Bigger numbers mean smaller fractions, as you so wisely point out. Thanks for backing me up.
Wow. Haha. This has to be one of the greatest things I have heard someone say on here in a long time.
Denominators are dumb lmfao!
They don't go backwards.
Do you really need to have fractions explained to you?
Newbies don't think like that? Is everyone new to photography in 1st grade?
ISO is 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, ... (and sometimes ISO 50)
Aperture is f/2, f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6, f/8, f/11, f/16, ...
Shutter Speed is 1/15 sec, 1/30 sec, 1/60 sec, 1/125 sec, 1/250 sec, 1/500 sec, 1/1000 sec, ... (and of course also 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 30 sec and Bulb mode)
Why is it not obvious that these numbers may look very confusing to a newbie ?
I just hope, just one day, someone stops reading into my posts and just reads the words.
Go back and re-read my post, and show me how any of this was even the point I argued.