FASHION

[Vladlarvin]

Waiting for your critics, thanks

 

[Derrel]

I am not fond of the dark, deep blue tint. There's a photo in there somewhere, but it's very well-hidden. I think a much lighter tiny might look better. I gave it a rating of 2 on the scale of 2 to 5.

 

[Designer]

Moody, evocative, mysterious, disturbing. I think the title of "fashion" is not appropriate. At least not accurate in the sense of fashionable clothing anyway. Has possibilities.

 

[71M]

I rated it at 4, but I think ~3.5.

 

[AR15th]

I can't see what she's wearing...
however I do see why you'd call this a fashion shot... "editorial" I guess. The blue is cool, but I think a bit more light would've made this shot perf.

 

[DanOstergren29 5]

This to me does not qualify as a fashion shot. The clothes need to be the hero of the shot, then the makeup and hair, and there is really nothing pulling my attention to any of these things. To me the wardrobe styling is poor and uninteresting, and the hair does not look good to me at all. The lighting is interesting and nice in my opinion, but again I have to point out that it does nothing to bring any sort of attention to the clothing, makeup or hair. I would really work on those things if you want to be creating fashion photography.

 

[TreeofLifeStairs]

At first it kind of hurt my eyes but it was interesting enough to keep my attention. I would clone out the highlight on the seat. Cool makeup but like addressed before I think it could be lightened up more to make it easier to see.

 

[KmH]

Is a score of 2 good, or bad?
Fashion? I don't see how it could be considered a fashion shot.

IMO the photo has little merit beyond being in focus, in any genre.