What's new

First go at macro!

NIce.. looks like you have focus and DOF down pretty well! Obviously you were not at 1:1 macro range, as the focusing distance on that 40mm is pretty short, and would have probably scared off your subjects. Some crops would be suggested! ;)
 
Got to say I love that first photo - that almost watercolour background works well for a flowery/garden scene!
 
NIce.. looks like you have focus and DOF down pretty well! Obviously you were not at 1:1 macro range, as the focusing distance on that 40mm is pretty short, and would have probably scared off your subjects. Some crops would be suggested! ;)

Is it possible of getting 1:1 with this lens because it does say it can. Obviously I would have to be damn close :-)
 
GraemeReen said:
Is it possible of getting 1:1 with this lens because it does say it can. Obviously I would have to be damn close :-)

It's possible but you'll be right on top of your subject.
 
You can easily see for yourself - just set the focus to manual and focus on the closest point possible - then move the camera closer and closer to the subject until you get focus (ps this is how most macro photography is done - ergo without AF since its generally not that reliable at macro work).

With a 40mm you will be very close which presents a few difficulties:

1) Increased chance of spooking an insects - generally you'll want to be shooting either slow bugs or those cold after a long night, so getting up very early in the morning. Feeding times are also good chances to get insects at a less cautionary state.

2) Shadowing - you'll be close enough that the camera and lens will be shadowing the subject, making lighting much more tricky

3) Hard to add additional lighting - close up means its going to be harder to add light because you won't have much space to fit the lighting support into.


In general I'd say short macro lenses like that are good for close-up work of a similar scale to what you've shown and good for 1:1 macro when the subject is well lit and very static (flowers, documents etc...). For other work its a very difficult lens to use because of that short working distance (I say that as someone with a 35mm macro lens so I know well how tiny that working distance is) .
 
Overread said:
You can easily see for yourself - just set the focus to manual and focus on the closest point possible - then move the camera closer and closer to the subject until you get focus (ps this is how most macro photography is done - ergo without AF since its generally not that reliable at macro work).

With a 40mm you will be very close which presents a few difficulties:

1) Increased chance of spooking an insects - generally you'll want to be shooting either slow bugs or those cold after a long night, so getting up very early in the morning. Feeding times are also good chances to get insects at a less cautionary state.

2) Shadowing - you'll be close enough that the camera and lens will be shadowing the subject, making lighting much more tricky

3) Hard to add additional lighting - close up means its going to be harder to add light because you won't have much space to fit the lighting support into.

In general I'd say short macro lenses like that are good for close-up work of a similar scale to what you've shown and good for 1:1 macro when the subject is well lit and very static (flowers, documents etc...). For other work its a very difficult lens to use because of that short working distance (I say that as someone with a 35mm macro lens so I know well how tiny that working distance is) .

Thanks for the tips. I like a challenge :-)
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom