Foster Party Pics

[jcdeboever]

Deleted

 

[snowbear]

Awww (at least the first two). The white balance might need a little tweaking on the kids - the skin tones look a bit cool to me.


edit: I was trying to figure out what "mist men" were - I got it (most men)

 

[jcdeboever]

Awww (at least the first two). The white balance might need a little tweaking on the kids - the skin tones look a bit cool to me.


edit: I was trying to figure out what "mist men" were - I got it (most men)

I screwed the pooch and did not have raw setup. In fairness to my noobness, I set the camera up at that time to Rockwell's website D3300 camera setup recommendation and all were jpeg. Big mistake looking back. At least I learned from it. These are pretty much out of camera.

Just a brilliant little girl. Full of life... Does not trust most men.



Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[snowbear]

It's not that much of an adjustment. I just used the LR eyedropper on the railing in the background.

 

[Shades of Blue]

Isn't it funny how there is ALWAYS another photographer at the shoot? At least, that's happened to me a few times... lol

I actually like the last image the best.

 

[LebronPhoto]

The colors look perfect on my iPhone. I think you did well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[jcdeboever]

Thank you all

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[Enlight]

Great color grading in post. Lots of people fail to acknowledge how important that is to do right.

 

[Granddad]

A very nice set. Well done.

Just an off the subject query; if these are foster kids doesn't the authority in charge have restrictions on photos of them being published online? In my area it would be an absolute no-no. Not criticising, just asking in case you hadn't thought about that. If recognised, online photos could assist someone to trace them who shouldn't. I have neighbours with foster children and I'm told the county go ape about things like that.

 

[jcdeboever]

A very nice set. Well done.

Just an off the subject query; if these are foster kids doesn't the authority in charge have restrictions on photos of them being published online? In my area it would be an absolute no-no. Not criticising, just asking in case you hadn't thought about that. If recognised, online photos could assist someone to trace them who shouldn't. I have neighbours with foster children and I'm told the county go ape about things like that.

Good point.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[Granddad]

A very nice set. Well done.

Just an off the subject query; if these are foster kids doesn't the authority in charge have restrictions on photos of them being published online? In my area it would be an absolute no-no. Not criticising, just asking in case you hadn't thought about that. If recognised, online photos could assist someone to trace them who shouldn't. I have neighbours with foster children and I'm told the county go ape about things like that.

Good point.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Not that this forum is like FB or other social media platforms, but with what has happened to some of these kids to get them put into foster care...