Frustrated with my Nikon 24-70mm 2.8G

[goodguy]

Oh this was an old thread. Bah.

So, goodguy, what were you doing wrong?

Arrgghh…how did I miss both the date of the OP AND the whole second page that might have clued me in to the fact that this horse was DEAD already?

Not to worry, happened to me few times in the past

 

[gsgary]

You guys might get a kick out of this:


VC OFF

VC ON

both at 200mm--hand held.


That shot with VC on, at 1/20, is as sharp as my best shot with VC off at 1/125, which was about the borderline for tact-sharpness.

Like I said, I'm really impressed by VC. It's really cool watching the lens keep the image VERY stable in the viewfinder when it's engaged. It's very apparent--visually--how well it even works. And obviously, the test images speak loads as well.

Look how far it's underexposed