Pgriz is on the right track. The 18-55 and 55-200 are plenty for a beginner, and in all reality, plenty for most people that don't do this for a living. I've shot portraits, concerts, landscapes, architecture, macro, still life, and sports all with an 18-55mm and 55-250mm lens. I do own a few prime lenses, but I use them when I need better low light performance or I want a super shallow depth of field. Another benefit is they are usually a bit sharper than zooms.
The camera is just your tool, you have to make the image great. Ansel Adams didn't have a 5dmkIII with a 16-35 f2.8, but his images still look great. Noise performance and sharpness are some of the least important aspects of photography.
Do you want to learn photography, or do you simply own a DSLR to have a nice camera to take pictures with? If you want to get into photography, take lots of pictures. Not meaningless ones, try to take images that mean something. This is something I just recently grasped myself. A photo can be technically perfect, but if it doesn't capture anything interesting or meaningful, it's just a picture.
I would also suggest you look up a few things...
- Composition, the rule of 3rds
- Exposure triangle, how to use your DSLR in manual mode
- How DSLR lenses work, what focal lengths do to your images
- Using available light. One of the most beautiful and color accurate light sources is right outside your door, and it doesn't cost a penny to use!