Designer
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2012
- Messages
- 18,505
- Reaction score
- 4,853
- Location
- Iowa
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
What you see:
Stamford, Lincolnshire, UK, is Georgian. Consequently, the local building code requires that new construction reflect the styling that is found in the earlier buildings. This is a shot of a car wash which is part of a petrol station in Stamford. As you can see, the inside is just a regular modern car wash, but the exterior is styled like a 17th century building.
Why I chose to make this photograph:
Wherever I am, I am often struck by irony, whether it is in people, places, or buildings. My architectural background has attuned my attention to buildings, but it is primarily the irony that captures my imagination. So we see what is essentially a modern gas station with car wash, designed to look older than even cars themselves.
How did I see this shot?
After a day of touring the East Midlands, needing some diesel and a quick wash-up on the way back to my son's home. There it was, a Georgian car wash in all its limestone cladding, just wanting to become a part of my collection of architectural irony.
What photographic equipment was used?
This was before I had purchased my first DSLR, so I was using my Canon PowerShot A570is, my trusty little P&S that I carried on more than one trip to Europe. The settings were; ISO 80, fl;6mm, 0ev, f/4, 1/200, AWB, JPEG.
What was my intent - what did I hope to show?
I wanted to show the juxtaposition of new and (intended to be) old and to show the resourcefulness of the architects who had to give a styling nod to the predominant style of architecture while providing a modern utilitarian facility.
What kind of PP-ing did I do?
Just a little lightening of the shadows to compensate for the fact that my camera's range did not capture much detail in the shadows.
Why did I make those choices?
I think I got a pretty good frame, considering that the building and the car are cropped, my attention was focused on the juxtaposition, and not the entire building, and certainly not the car. Therefore, I did no further editing of the frame, but the shadows lacked detail, so I boosted the shade areas inside the building a little bit.
Please tell me if I achieved my goal of showing the irony? Doing a re-shoot is unrealistic, so tell me (in retrospect) what else I might have done to achieve my goal. Thanks.
Stamford, Lincolnshire, UK, is Georgian. Consequently, the local building code requires that new construction reflect the styling that is found in the earlier buildings. This is a shot of a car wash which is part of a petrol station in Stamford. As you can see, the inside is just a regular modern car wash, but the exterior is styled like a 17th century building.
Why I chose to make this photograph:
Wherever I am, I am often struck by irony, whether it is in people, places, or buildings. My architectural background has attuned my attention to buildings, but it is primarily the irony that captures my imagination. So we see what is essentially a modern gas station with car wash, designed to look older than even cars themselves.
How did I see this shot?
After a day of touring the East Midlands, needing some diesel and a quick wash-up on the way back to my son's home. There it was, a Georgian car wash in all its limestone cladding, just wanting to become a part of my collection of architectural irony.
What photographic equipment was used?
This was before I had purchased my first DSLR, so I was using my Canon PowerShot A570is, my trusty little P&S that I carried on more than one trip to Europe. The settings were; ISO 80, fl;6mm, 0ev, f/4, 1/200, AWB, JPEG.
What was my intent - what did I hope to show?
I wanted to show the juxtaposition of new and (intended to be) old and to show the resourcefulness of the architects who had to give a styling nod to the predominant style of architecture while providing a modern utilitarian facility.
What kind of PP-ing did I do?
Just a little lightening of the shadows to compensate for the fact that my camera's range did not capture much detail in the shadows.
Why did I make those choices?
I think I got a pretty good frame, considering that the building and the car are cropped, my attention was focused on the juxtaposition, and not the entire building, and certainly not the car. Therefore, I did no further editing of the frame, but the shadows lacked detail, so I boosted the shade areas inside the building a little bit.
Please tell me if I achieved my goal of showing the irony? Doing a re-shoot is unrealistic, so tell me (in retrospect) what else I might have done to achieve my goal. Thanks.
Last edited: