What's new

Goodbye Photoshop

Status
Not open for further replies.
Glad I don't use it much or I'd be looking for a different editor. No way in the world I'll pay a monthly fee to use software.
 
Well, that's unfortunate. I know there are a few companies out there that have created alternatives to photoshop. I wonder if they will become more predominant now.
 
No big whoop, cheaper in the long run with butter support.
 
No big whoop, cheaper in the long run with butter support.

I don't know about cheaper in the long run but not having to upgrade every couple of years would be nice. This way you always have the latest and greatest. Couldn't make myself do it last year before I bought lr4 but the more I learn about CS6, the more I want it.
 
No big whoop, cheaper in the long run with butter support.
Cheaper if you upgraded every year perhaps, but how many small businesses or individuals would or could afford to do that? This is going to take some serious thought.
 
Probably hurts the middle class hobbyist market, who have chunks of cash, and prefer the overall savings to a monthly recurring charge (and who are also less used to the subscription model). Probably good for professional and 'barely scraping by artist' markets. The former like constant monthly costs over a 1.5 year cost that is hard to make year to year cash flows work for, the latter can't afford the up front fee, but could maybe squeeze it in on a monthly basis.
 
Bend over, grab your ankles, and brace...it's Adobe $y$tems coming up behind you!!!

Wow, talk about ra**ng the customers that helped build their business...

Who the heck needs "support" for Photoshop...load it on your Mac and it just "works". Support is a joke for much of their core market.
 
Bend over, grab your ankles, and brace...it's Adobe $y$tems coming up behind you!!!

Wow, talk about ra**ng the customers that helped build their business...

Who the heck needs "support" for Photoshop...load it on your Mac and it just "works". Support is a joke for much of their core market.

Oh really? As a person who uses 90% of adobe's products on a daily basis this is a godsend. Saves me a ton of money in the long run.

If you read the article you would have noticed that the core group of users are the ones that supported this move. I being one of them.

You can always switch to something like gimp or corel if you are so offended.
 
I'm really struggling with this decision right now, because I just bought a new desktop and intended to get CS6. I already knew they are pushing that Creative Cloud like nobody's business, but I am balking at it.

For work, I'm okay with the Cloud, because I run two computers--one Mac and one PC--and the software there needs to be kept *fairly* updated in order to not have issues with the different printers we use for our out-of-house items. In fact, I've already run into an issue today with one of our printers because they're running CS 5.5 and I'm running CS5--they had to export an .idml file for me instead of an InDesign file even though it was essentially the SAME file I'd originally sent to them in the first place.
We'll actually not spend any more to use the Cloud, since currently we have to buy the software for both platforms.

But personally--this stinks. I rarely, if ever, upgrade from one version to the next. I almost always wait at least ONE upgrade, like from CS5 to CS7 (I don't count those silly .5 marketing ploys as upgrades), and depending on the software, sometimes I don't upgrade for years. Heck, I was still running Office 2007 until my son made me upgrade that last year.

It's going to be way more expensive for me, since it's going to mean a commitment to a monthly or yearly fee--AND, if you get in a bind and decide you just can't pay that anymore, well as soon as your subscription runs out, you don't even have the outdated software to limp along on. You're just out of luck completely. It's like leasing a car--and I detest the idea of leasing.

If I only used Photoshop, I think I'd probably start looking at Gimp or something else that would do instead--I really don't do THAT much editing to my photos, and I'm fairly sure I could manage with something else.
However, I have a few contract jobs through the year--one in particular that generally pays pretty well--and I really need InDesign and Illustrator to do most of those jobs. Or at least, to do them efficiently and well. So, I guess I'm kinda stuck with Adobe for the immediate future.
I'll probably up my hourly rate I charge just a little bit to try to plan for this expense for next year, without pricing myself so high that I lose the contract work.

In the meantime, right now I'm thinking I'll still go ahead and buy the CS6 outright. That way, if I move to the Cloud next year with CS7, I'll still have CS6 to fall back on if I needed it.
 
I laughed..the so-called core group of users that is quoted in the article "supports" being charged on a monthly basis...

zOMG...wow...gullible much???
 
I laughed..the so-called core group of users that is quoted in the article "supports" being charged on a monthly basis...

zOMG...wow...gullible much???

The full version of Photoshop CS6 is $650, and if you do the new membership it's only $20 a month so that's 32 months or 2 years and 7 months.

Most people are on a two year upgrade cycle so you are actually saving money in the long run.

What is you creative cloud username?
 
Read what ACTUAL Adobe Photoshop customers are saying...this idea is being seen and condemned for the blatant rip-off that it actually is. I don't mean the people that Adobe payed to say they want a good ass-reaming in a press release, but their actual, current user base...

Adobe heralds subscription-only future for Photoshop and Creative Suite: Digital Photography Review

This latest money-grab is being met with the response that a blatant money-grab is typically met with...meaning jeers of derision and expressions of disgust and contempt. Nice going Adobe!!!
 
Is it any more of a money grab than raising the price on the next release? The people it hurts most are the people who skip upgrade cycles. If you were the kind of user that upgraded every cycle, it's likely equalled out, when you consider future price hikes.

The weird thing to me is how people seem to be discussing it as a different type of price raise? Would CS7 getting a $100 price bump generate this much outrage? Unlikely. And outside of the price raise, isn't instant updates a good thing?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Most reactions

Back
Top Bottom