Gotta LOVE my new 35 1.4 L! - NEW MODEL PIX!

[MohaimenK]

New kid on the block with a big impact! Got it a few days ago but didn't have time put it to use. Finally got to today. Some samples from a shoot earlier today.

1.

2.

3.

4. Like the grain or not, I'm keeping it. I think it goes well w/ the pic and style.

 

[SAPerkins01]

LOVE #1. It was like unwrapping a present!

 

[DisasterDan]

<3

 

[Live_free]

Hot girl... sexy photos... win/win

 

[MohaimenK]

Thank you I have so many more but here are couple in B&W

 

[Robin Usagani]

Nice Mo. Not sure whether I should get this lens first or a new body. I personally won't use the lens unless I use it wide open or almost wide open. I rather use your 85 or 70-200 if you don't shoot it wide open.

 

[thierry]

wow.. nice lens and shots

 

[MohaimenK]

That's a tricky decision. I can use this on my 5d2 at weddings with the 85 or the 70-200 on the t1i. Both bodies with flash worked well for the last wedding. But personally, you can't go wrong with either. Especially when you have 50 1.4 for now, I'd get the body?

And again thank you all!

 

[wlbphoto]

like always i enjoy seeing the work... :thumbup:

 

[MohaimenK]

ok last one for the night. Im too tired to think and stay awake! but its always exciting to edit more G' night everybody!

 

[DogGoneGood]

Wow, absolutely stunning photo's!

 

[bigboi3]

GREAT STUFF!!

 

[raphaelaaron]

1st one is the keeper. though i can't quite tell if its focused all the way on her eyes.

good job

 

[Ron Evers]

I like #4 a lot but the narrow DOF does not work for me on the other three. Just because you can does not mean you should.

 

[Robin Usagani]

That is what hot right now in wedding industry Ron. Something you don't see with your own eyes. Very thin DOF photos are selling like hotcakes.

I like #4 a lot but the narrow DOF does not work for me on the other three. Just because you can does not mean you should.