denada
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2016
- Messages
- 241
- Reaction score
- 115
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
yo look at this ...
this is cinestill 800t out of a mjuii without light leaks. machine developed. scanned on a fuji frontier sp. why does it look like garbage? in the bottom left corner you can see the biggest problem. i don't know how to describe that effect, but it's present in almost frame. also the frame looks dirty, there's some stain by the door frame, and there's some light leak looking pattern.
and look at this girl's pupils ...
[photo is very cropped]
how could one of them be shifted like that? the other one doesn't look right either; the contrast is weird.
an old roll (it was cinestill's new packaging so it can't be too terribly old)? manufacturing defect? something go wrong during development? something go wrong during scan?
i do not have access to the roll or a scanner, and will not for a long time. i'm wondering if i wait and rescan the roll, will i be able to fix this? or is this just the way the negatives look and i should make do with whatever i can manage in post?
oh. the other roll that got developed with this one looks like trash too. it isn't dirty or showing the light leak pattern, but it has that same weird contrast effect. it's kodak gold, so not like it's a bad batch of film.
thanks!
this is cinestill 800t out of a mjuii without light leaks. machine developed. scanned on a fuji frontier sp. why does it look like garbage? in the bottom left corner you can see the biggest problem. i don't know how to describe that effect, but it's present in almost frame. also the frame looks dirty, there's some stain by the door frame, and there's some light leak looking pattern.
and look at this girl's pupils ...
[photo is very cropped]
how could one of them be shifted like that? the other one doesn't look right either; the contrast is weird.
an old roll (it was cinestill's new packaging so it can't be too terribly old)? manufacturing defect? something go wrong during development? something go wrong during scan?
i do not have access to the roll or a scanner, and will not for a long time. i'm wondering if i wait and rescan the roll, will i be able to fix this? or is this just the way the negatives look and i should make do with whatever i can manage in post?
oh. the other roll that got developed with this one looks like trash too. it isn't dirty or showing the light leak pattern, but it has that same weird contrast effect. it's kodak gold, so not like it's a bad batch of film.
thanks!
Last edited: