You don't need a darkroom to develop the film. It's nice, but a dark bag will do as well.
Yes, a bag will be ordered when I need to replenish the chemicals. I'd like to try wet printing, though, and the store do nice starter packs with an enlarger, lens, trays, etc,. I think I'm hooked!
I'll order a stop bath for next time. But If I used vinegar, what sort of amount is needed? The couple of times I used it, I just poured it right out of the gallon container from the kitchen full strength.
I have a Paterson daylight tank. For washing, crack the lid and just run the water down the center "funnel"; 1-2 times a minute, invert it and pour all the water out.
I'll wash as advised next time. Should the water be lukewarm or is cold OK? Can it be seen on my results that the washing wasn't adequate? I always had all my fluids at the same temperature unless the manufacturer recommdended differently. The most apparent evidence of inadequate washing is the appearance of white/yellowish patches of powder on the negative, which is dried fixer.
Bear in mind... it's been a long time since I've been in a wet darkroom; things may have changed. Someone like Limr or gsgary can probably give you more up-to-date advice.
Thanks for the info.
I'll wash as advised next time. Should the water be lukewarm or is cold OK? Can it be seen on my results that the washing wasn't adequate?
I prefer the same temperature for wash as what the rest of the liquids were prior to it. In my case, 68°F.
I'll do the same, then. Thanks.
Over agitation = grain. I found that I had good negative with minimal agitation ... but start with the book then over time reduce the agitation slightly until you have the results you seek.
Good to know. I have a note book to keep track of things a bit, so that I can try to get consistent results; I'll also note how much agitation I used and compare results.
Only if the film is not sensitive to red light. And if it were that way, you'd end up with very funny looking images.
It acutely would not look all that funny. The early forms of photography used orthochromatic emulsions aka not sensitive to red light. There are actually a surprising number of large format photographers that use x-ray film to take pictures even though it is a orthochromatic film. X-ray film is dirt cheep and you can develop it under red light conditions.
Thanks for the info on X-ray film.
Those are really nice photos.
I've read that people use vinegar (for darkroom work and for house cleaning) but to me, that would smell worse than the chemistry - seriously! A little goes a long way for me, I'd just get some stop.
You could practice loading film on the reel, I've used a roll that didn't turn out, sit and practice while you're watching TV or something.
From what I've seen and read, xray film can scratch really easily, maybe if you try something new do that once you feel like you've got this process down.
You got beautiful results.
Thank you very much. Yes, I really must practise at loading the reel! I tried it a few times over the last few days with old films and was able to do it with my eyes closed, but it was a different story with a live run!
From what I've seen and read, xray film can scratch really easily, maybe if you try something new do that once you feel like you've got this process down.
Yes it will scratch easily, but you must understand it is NOT a roll film. It comes in sheets and you shoot it in sheets using a large format camera. You then develop it in trays or in a did and dunk system. Its not a type of film that you would me handling heavily and rolling onto reels.
Maybe something for the future, then. For now, I'm strictly 35mm.
The only things I have to add:
1. I don't use a stop bath either, but I also use Caffenol and as far as I know or have read, water is just fine as a stop bath for that developer.
2. The 5/10/20 washing scheme is Ilfords recommended washing method and I've used that with no issues. Well, actually, I do 5/10/15/20 because I'm kind of OCD that way
Oh, and also, welcome to the home developing club! Your welcome packet and member button will be in the mail and should arrive shortly!
Seriously, it felt pretty magical to see those images on the film, right??
If I do it this way again, I'll add the extra 15 inversions
I look forward to getting my badge; actually I thought about having a T-shirt made that says,
Late Developer. Yes, It felt very good seeing the images, although when i took the reel out of the tank all I could see was dark, clear film and I thought I'd botched it. But when I rolled it out, those babies were there!
No need for pre wash, I agitate for first 30 seconds and then 4 inversions every minute
Thanks, Gary. I'll try it this way, too.
[/QUOTE]
You will only know in 20 years or so if your washing was insufficient, I use a force washer for 5-10 minutes[/QUOTE]
That's what I feared but by then I'll be too far gone to care. Info on washing very useful.