HP5 vs. Tri-x

Which one?

  • HP5

    Votes: 9 50.0%
  • Tri-x

    Votes: 6 33.3%
  • other

    Votes: 3 16.7%

  • Total voters
    18
Tri-X is not a high contrast film.

The formula changed significantly 5 or 6 years ago...less silver although Kodak refuse to go into details.

Many photographers I know either stocked up on thousands of rolls of the original (deep frozen) or moved away to HP5 or Fuji Neopan.

A few good alternatives with similar properties can be obtained from the Czech and Polish manufacturers.
 
I always liked Tri-X, but it seems Kodak has lessened the quality standard they set so many years ago. I still like it, and voted for it, but it's more because old habits die hard. It's not the same film I grew up with.
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top