I think it depends on the level of editing you're doing. No one ever sees my SOOC images either. I edit. I clone out a stray hair here, a blemish there. I re-crop, adjust contrast, saturation, WB if needed, sharpening, etc. I always try to get it "right" in camera, but in reality it just doesn't happen all the time, for anyone, ever. Besides, what is "right?" It's all subjective, and depends on ones creative vision. To some - the only "right" is technically correct exposure, true to life colors, etc. To others, "right" would be whatever creativity they want to employ. Especially with those who market themselves as "fine art photographers" - I think there's a lot more creative liberties taken.
In images I want to feel more "artistic," I take more liberties. I enhance a haze or a flare, I manipulate the colors and saturation to give a more ethereal look than one would see naturally. And especially with the fairy series I've done with a few little girls - obviously I am photoshopping in wings and pixie dust. That stuff does not exist in reality.
I have to draw the line somewhere, though. There's some very specific examples in my head where seeing the SOOC vs the final edit seriously devalued my opinion of the photographer in question. It's very hard to describe why, too. The final edit was awe-inspiring, because of the overall feel, color - everything was completely life like, I would have believed it was possible to see that in real life, and while maybe not capture it in camera as you saw it... the finished product looked to be an exceptionally done (potentially very lucky due to the placement of some elements), realistic capture and edit of what was a beautiful subject in a beautiful setting.
Then I saw the SOOC. The light, colors, contrast, composition - nothing was at all close to what was actually captured in camera. In some cases, whole objects were cloned in. Not obvious fantasty objects like wings either - like normal every day things you'd expect to see in a setting like that, that you were given the impression were parts of the original image. So at what point does it become "photography" versus "photoshopography?" Where's the line between capturing and editing an image to give it a certain "feel" to yourself and the audience, and becoming so talented at photoshop that you can make stuff up to make people swoon over you?
All of that said - this is just my opinion, and I'm sure others will differ.