evo5gsr
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2008
- Messages
- 131
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Bay Area
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
After all that waiting, I think I'm ready to get that Pentax K100. What do you guys think of this?
http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=10006388&prodlist=froogle
Resellerratings is giving me mixed reviews.
http://www.resellerratings.com/store/ZipZoomFly
And then there's the question of lenses. Basically, I have it down to these four choices.
50mm 1.4
Pro:
@ 1.4...
Con: I'll be doing a lot of stepping back...literally
35mm 2.0
Pro: Wider than the nifty-fifty
Con: Not as fast
Sigma 18-50 2.8
Pro: Wide-ish; great workhorse
Con: Most expensive
Sigma 28-70 2.8
Pro: About $60 cheaper than the 18-50; I could use the extra length, since I probably won't be getting a telephoto lens anytime soon.
Con: Not as wide as I would like.
I'm most likely gonna be shooting typical scenic and land/cityscape images, and not as much portraits.
http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=10006388&prodlist=froogle
Resellerratings is giving me mixed reviews.
http://www.resellerratings.com/store/ZipZoomFly
And then there's the question of lenses. Basically, I have it down to these four choices.
50mm 1.4
Pro:
@ 1.4...Con: I'll be doing a lot of stepping back...literally
35mm 2.0
Pro: Wider than the nifty-fifty
Con: Not as fast
Sigma 18-50 2.8
Pro: Wide-ish; great workhorse
Con: Most expensive
Sigma 28-70 2.8
Pro: About $60 cheaper than the 18-50; I could use the extra length, since I probably won't be getting a telephoto lens anytime soon.
Con: Not as wide as I would like.
I'm most likely gonna be shooting typical scenic and land/cityscape images, and not as much portraits.