- Joined
- Nov 19, 2010
- Messages
- 2,507
- Reaction score
- 440
- Location
- San Jose, CA
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS
Might even be a tiny bit cheaper! And its sharp enough to take a 2*TC decently!
What are you using now? I saw you wanted to get into sports. And what sports?
Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS
Might even be a tiny bit cheaper! And its sharp enough to take a 2*TC decently!
Sigma has a fixed 300 2.8 too don't they? ARGH I shoot night time / indoor sports several times a week it makes sense to own one but it is so expensive.
You might find 300 to be a bit short still if shooting football. I wanted that lens too, and decided it still didnt give me enough reach. Im trying to save for something even longer... It is a killer lens though...
From all that I've heard their 120-300mm, even the older version, was either in line or a cut above their prime - the new OS edition of the 120-300mm is better still!
For indoor and sports a 300mm f2.8 would be ideal for light gathering - a 400mm f2.8 also being a very popular lens as well for that extra reach for outdoor events on a larger pitch.

Does it have to be autofocus? I see one ais version in Minneapolis Craiglist for $1,200.
Or that Tokina that Cgipson bought and returned.
Nikon Autofocus 300 F2.8 TOKINA ATX PRO (112/35.5) *WITH HOOD, CAPS, CASE , 35MM SLR AUTO FOCUS TELEPHOTO LENS - KEH.com
or the tamron 300 2.8 for $695
Nikon Autofocus 300 F2.8 TAMRON INTERNAL FOCUS LD SP (112/43) FILM ONLY *WITH HOOD, CAPS, CASE , 35MM SLR AUTO FOCUS TELEPHOTO LENS - KEH.com
Something must be wrong with me because I only fantasize about women.
Something must be wrong with you because I don't need to fantasize about women.![]()