What's new

I would do dirty things..

tevo

Recovering TPF Junkie
Joined
Nov 19, 2010
Messages
2,507
Reaction score
440
Location
San Jose, CA
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
...for a 300 2.8. I have been drooling over this lens for months now and I want to try and buy one for sports / wildlife stuff. There are a few in good condition on eBay for 2500 but eBay is sketchy.

D:
 
Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS ;)


Might even be a tiny bit cheaper! And its sharp enough to take a 2*TC decently!
 
Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS ;)

Might even be a tiny bit cheaper! And its sharp enough to take a 2*TC decently!

Sigma has a fixed 300 2.8 too don't they? ARGH I shoot night time / indoor sports several times a week it makes sense to own one but it is so expensive.
 
What are you using now? I saw you wanted to get into sports. And what sports?
 
What are you using now? I saw you wanted to get into sports. And what sports?

I have shot volleyball, soccer, basketball, football, lacrosse, rugby and baseball regularly (during the season of course) for the last couple years. For nighttime and indoor sports I have used the 80-200 2.8, and for outdoor daytime sports the 70-300 4.5-5.6 VR. Body is a D7000, upgrading to either a D700 or a D3 (maybe D3s) in the near future. If a good enough deal popped up on a 300 2.8 I would be tempted to buy that first honestly...
 
You might find 300 to be a bit short still if shooting football. I wanted that lens too, and decided it still didnt give me enough reach. Im trying to save for something even longer... It is a killer lens though...
 
Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS ;)

Might even be a tiny bit cheaper! And its sharp enough to take a 2*TC decently!

Sigma has a fixed 300 2.8 too don't they? ARGH I shoot night time / indoor sports several times a week it makes sense to own one but it is so expensive.

From all that I've heard their 120-300mm, even the older version, was either in line or a cut above their prime - the new OS edition of the 120-300mm is better still!

For indoor and sports a 300mm f2.8 would be ideal for light gathering - a 400mm f2.8 also being a very popular lens as well for that extra reach for outdoor events on a larger pitch.
 
You might find 300 to be a bit short still if shooting football. I wanted that lens too, and decided it still didnt give me enough reach. Im trying to save for something even longer... It is a killer lens though...

For outdoor night sports I would just use the 300 on my D7000 to take advantage of the crop sensor. I shoot football near the line of scrimmage generally speaking so the 300 is very workable.
 
From all that I've heard their 120-300mm, even the older version, was either in line or a cut above their prime - the new OS edition of the 120-300mm is better still!

For indoor and sports a 300mm f2.8 would be ideal for light gathering - a 400mm f2.8 also being a very popular lens as well for that extra reach for outdoor events on a larger pitch.

A 400 2.8...... :drool:

With the exception of the Tokina 11-16 I have tried to remain true to sticking with Nikon glass, although the price of the sigma is tempting.
 

Since I'd be using it mostly for sports, autofocus is a must. A manual focus version would be cool to have for portraits, but I'd rather put that money into an AF version.
 
Something must be wrong with me because I only fantasize about women.
 
Something must be wrong with you because I don't need to fantasize about women. ;)

You'd rather fantasize about long, hard, black, cylinder shaped objects in your hands.

That's fine, I am not the judgmental type. ;)
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom