Alexecho (

), I am only now getting into this conversation and have read only about the first half of it, now I am itching to reply even though I might be repeating things that have been said before in the second half.
But I feel I am kind of "following you in your path".
While, unlike yourself, I never took any photography class ever in all my life and therefore could not be critisised to a point where I would lose all interest, I did start out with film (nothing else to be had at the time, digital photography was unthought of then!) and a tiny camera (Rollei35), then at some point in time gained access to an SLR (my husband's cheap one that he had at the time and quickly "lost" to me :greenpbl: ), later got myself the Canon EOS 500N that you can (barely) see in my sig ... and 6 months ago got myself my first own compact digital camera.
So I have come from the film, am still using film - and with great pleasure, as long as lenses and camera work well (!) - and ... and now this is the news: have developed an urgent desire to go back "to the roots" and start taking photos
also (i.e. in addition to what I am already doing) with a very manual-only camera these days, just so I am forced to learn more, look better, and get the kind of "eye" that Marctwo is speaking about. So yes, in a way, digital photography has inspired me to look for more, and to look for the "roots" and to test out myself, my long-lost abilities to meter and focus a photo and to thus learn even more.
The enthusiasm has grown with the digital camera.
But I feel that also my acceptance has grown and I see virtue in any kind of photography now. (Whether I will still see any "good" in my newest experiment with the camera that I brought home with me from my last weekend's visit to my sister's is yet to show, I haven't finished the film as yet ... while I have taken digital photos worth the amount of three rolls of film in the mean time

. Kind of proves Marctwo's thoughts, right?)