MLeeK
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2011
- Messages
- 6,761
- Reaction score
- 1,380
- Location
- NY
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
- Thread Starter 🔹
- #16
You hit right to the heart of my whole rant. I knew it was bothering me, but I didn't really put together the entertainment factor. That's exactly what this is-which makes me REALLY want to call them names far beyond a$$hole. This isn't entertainment, it's peoples REALITY. LIVES. Sensationalism at it's best is what's gotten to me.Every storm that kills ONE person or more is a devastating storm.
Still, the media DOES seem to have this great need to "outdo" themselves every time. I mean, they can't just come on and say "Well, it's no Katrina..."
Yesterday, as I was listening to the news coverage of the storm, it struck me, AGAIN, how we no longer actually HAVE news reports. We have entertainment broadcasts, "media events," but not NEWS. And at one point, it all kinda hit home, and I realized why books/movies like The Hunger Games are so popular--because that's what we're getting already in our "news" broadcasts.
Think about it. First, the national news I was watching was broadcasting much of the storm coverage from a place called "Point Pleasant, NJ." Point PLEASANT? In a Hurricane/Tropical Storm/Nor'easter/whatever-you-call-it? You can't TELL me THAT was a coincidence! Then you've got these "news" people standing out in hurricane force winds, screaming to be heard above the sound of crashing waves and wind, while bracing themselves to keep from being picked up and dashed against the nearest boulder, all so that they can tell us how much WORSE it's gonna be. In my head, I hear Walter Cronkite, and he's saying, "H*ll no, I'm not going out to report in that. I can see from HERE that the wind is blowing 100 mph, thank you very much."
I could just imagine them saying "How many do you think will die?? How many will be seriously injured, or without power for days, maybe weeks?? Call toll-free now with YOUR guesses, and you could WIN!" It's like it's all some big game to entertain those of us who are watching, and so each one MUST be bigger and more interesting, and of course, more catastrophic than the last. At one point last night, I actually laughed out loud at the absurdity when a reporter (I think it may have actually been Al Roker, don't remember), who had been on air for several minutes already, talking about how bad the winds were, how much worse it was going to get, how many could be affected, on and on, then suddenly he said, "I really don't want to alarm anyone, but..."
Seriously??? You don't want to ALARM anyone?? Then why have you just been doing your d*mnedest to frighten their socks off and make them all run and hide under their beds (assuming their beds were on a high enough hill, of course...)?
Don't get me wrong--like I said, any storm in which someone loses their life, is a serious, devastating storm, and deserves our attention. I just wish it didn't have to be made into entertainment instead of a decent, respectable news report.
</end rant>
Anyone heard from coastalconn?
You know, I've never thought about the 'entertainment' part of it but you are so right. And that gets right to the heart of my rant. They have to make it RIVETING ENTERTAINMENT and pull in that audience.
I don't even think they need to say "well it's no Katrina, but..." It's just a devastating storm. Period. REPORT the damage and what is needed. Don't make it out to be the worst ever or into a competition. It's not and that's a bit demeaning to the thousands and thousands of people totally devastated by prior disasters. Why does it have to be bigger and better? ya know? I don't need the hype, I just need to see what has happened and what is being organized for relief efforts, where we can put in any help and that everyone is OK that we know out there. This is mother nature, don't dare her or she might just make it worse!

