Is there an advantage to shooting B&W from your camera instead of PP

jg123

TPF Noob!
Joined
Apr 23, 2008
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Here is a picture that I really like the B&W version of but I am wondering if I would have gotten a better quality pic if I used the B&W setting on the camera (Canon XSI) when I first took it? I just changed it over to B&W in Picasa

2539359373_1e9c8673d0_b.jpg
 
Theres not really a benefit, but there is a downside to doing that; you cant go back to color if you want to.
 
Don't mean to hijack the thread or anything, but how about B&W film? Would there be much of a difference if you used B&W film over using color and Photoshop?
 
Muffinabus... the question is basically film vs. digital. That is a nightmare of a thread to start.

IMO, on print... B&W from negative done on traditional wet darkroom looks better than digital processed.
 
You are definitely putting yourself at a disadvantage shooting digital black and whites in your camera. Though as far as I know Picasa has pretty basic conversion options (is it just a button like iPhoto?), more feature-rich programs like Photoshop or GIMP give you very
powerful control over the process, allowing you to much more carefully tweak the black and white conversion to exactly how you want it.
 
The advantages to shooting in B&W on card is that you have a better idea of what it will look like already, and it takes up less space (if shooting in JPEG, not RAW).

The disadvantages were listed, and basically it is that if you ever want color in it, you're out of luck. Also, you can turn your photo into a black and white different ways, and each way makes it look slightly different. If you shoot B&W from the camera, you are not afforded this option.


I still shoot in B&W in camera. I probably shouldn't, but forget what people say. They are all correct in their statement that you should really shoot in color, but sometimes I just don't want to, and since my photography is all about me having a good time, I do it anyway. When the photo is yours, there's no wrong way to take it (just some are more interesting than others).

There's no listing of times for SD cards on the TMax dev bottle...does it vary by capacity? :greenpbl:

That's because it uses Compact Flash... :) BTW, this got me thinking. If you really wanted to confuse people, you could store your excess memory SD cards in a film canister. People would look at you funny when you have 4 rolls of film in the case of your DSLR (and no film camera in sight)!
 
One option you might want to consider is getting one of those eye-pieces that some people use when shooting in B&W.. it has nothing to do with the camera just a viewing aid to help you see the scene in B&W tones etc. I think it's just an olive green filter that you hold to your eye, can't remember the exact name for them. I think this might help you see in B&W and still shoot in colour - would make life easier than shooting in B&W to see if it works, then retaking in colour.

But if you like shooting in B&W that's entirely cool! you do what you like to do, have fun, and when you're out looking to shoot in B&W you see things slightly differently again, so it's all good.
 
there is a wratten 90 filter which is used quite often to help people learn how to translate color to a monochrome scene.

it does not convert to black and white, nor to green, but has an orange cast, but it does drop out the color so one can think in terms of light and shadow,

leaning to "see" in black and white is critical . for example; red , green and blue are very similar in grey tone with black and white film (or converted digital). when using film, we use filters to separate values so these tones aren't so close in value.
 
If you really wanted to confuse people, you could store your excess memory SD cards in a film canister. People would look at you funny when you have 4 rolls of film in the case of your DSLR (and no film camera in sight)!

I might do that once I get a DSLR...the Maxxum 8000i just needs one of these with a SideSaddle sized for 35mm canisters and a 1907 sling. Throw on a 500+mm lens and I should be stylin' big time right up until the cops tackle me.

In the meantime, if I was going to do something with the subject of the OP's photo, I'd move her over to a less busy background, tighten up the DOF and the zoom, and use Tri-X pushed a couple of stops. The dark sunglasses and clothes with light skin and in-between hair look like a good combination for the contrast I get from that film. Probably bounce some light onto her face from below/right, too, since the push might overdo the shadows and highlights there.

(Now if I could just plan out shots that thoroughly when I'm behind the camera, I'd be set.)
 
I have yet to shoot in B&W. I am still new, but I always B&W in PP.
And I usually B&W if all else fails in color. Like, if I have taken pictures that I really love, but I cannot get the color right in them in PP, I'll B&W them.
I had to do that with some shots of my son. They were too adorable to scrap, so I had to do what I could to save them.
:lmao:
 
There is a small advantage to shooting immediately in B&W: You can instantly see if the photo will look "good" in black & white, whereas with the PP stlye, you can't, and it can sometimes be a waste to find that the B&W photo actually looks like complete rubbish. However, the disadvantages far outweigh the advantages: You can't edit the B&W file as much as you can in Photoshop or the like (more/less red/green/blue, more/less contrast, various filter styles, etc) and most of all, you can't make a black & white photo colour again! :D
 
Try both on a shot to see if there's a difference for yourself.
 
B&W in PP.

much more control over levels and curves...and of course the option of enjoying the color version.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top