Personally, I wouldn't want either of those two lenses, but that's because they don't suit my needs. Lenses with such an extreme focal length as 28-200 tend to be rather like Swiss Army knives; that is, they do a lot, but don't do any of it extremely well. It's also relatively slow at the long end of it's range. Now, will that matter to you? Maybe, maybe not. It all depends on what sort of work you do, and where you interests in photography lay. As far as price goes, I would look for it to be under $150 unless it's new enough to come with a substantial portion of the warranty.
I can't comment on the suitability of the 80-200 for your camera; I suspect that it will fit, but may not have all of the automatic functions (focus, metering) available. That's a very useful focal length, but again a very slow lens. Remember that if you're going to hand-hold this lens at 200mm you need to have a shutter speed of at least 1/200 sec, and preferably 1/250+ to avoid camera shake. In dimmer conditions, that may be a challenge. Not familiar enough to speak to price.
So, all of that to say, "It depends". When asking "What about this lens" types of question, it really helps to include your intended use, budget, and level of experience. People are often able to recommend an alternative that you may not have thought of.