Calibun
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2013
- Messages
- 21
- Reaction score
- 1
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Hello! I am new, just joined. I was given a Canon Rebel t2 (or t2i? I forgot, been a while) as a birthday gift last year. I had been wanting something better than a P&S since I was a little girl so it was an awesome gift. I toy around with it to try and learn on my own for the last year (not very much however as I am a college student and often swamped with work) but I think it's time to join a forum and get some help!
My first question is about flash. I NEVER use the flash because it really washes out the photos, obviously, but indoors I have no choice. My house has a super open layout (ex no walls between living room, dining room, kitchen, entryway, and bonus room) and unfortunately high ceilings as well. When I try to take photos with the flash directly I obviously get washed out photos. When I bounce the flash with a mirror it comes out just fine, and sometimes with a homemade "diffuser" which I don't use any more (too cumbersome), except that I still have to have a high ISO to get enough light in because my house has so much open space it's almost as bad as trying to bounce the flash off of the sky. lol.
I was at walmart buying a card for my new phone and I noticed they have camera-mounted flash for canon cameras for pretty cheap ($60 ish) They swivel and look like they can be positioned to bounce off the ceiling very powerfully. Right now I literally just tape a small mirror to my pop-up flash that that works for now but obviously I look like a fool and can't use that out in public at places I like to visit like zoos. Are the camera-mounted, cheap external flashes worth it? $60 is not too bad for my wallet but I also am saving up for better lenses so that would come out of my lens fund and I want to make sure I'm not wasting money. I guess my main questions is, is it worth it to not look like a fool in public and will it even work the as bouncing the flash off the ceiling?
Is shooting in "RAW" a large advantage over shooting in large JPEG? What are the actual differences? (I googled a bit and could only deduce that RAW format holds better color and sometimes less noise? ) I really don't do much of any post-processing beyond cropping, re-size, and sometimes rarely color fix or a teeny bit of noise removal but I try to shoot with as low ISO as possible). I really just use my photos for facebook (personal stuff), church events, and sometimes try to help take photos for rescue dogs and other pets and a lot of candid photos so they don't need to be perfect to the pixel, and RAW entails a LOT more work for me. But if it's a big difference I am willing to do it.
I hope this is the right forum for these questions! If not mods please feel free to move it.
Here are some photos I have taken. Lots of animals. Sorry! I just love taking pictures of animals. Things that you see that can specifically be improved on would be appreciated. I have thin skin when it comes to insults but I will take constructive criticism happily.




My first question is about flash. I NEVER use the flash because it really washes out the photos, obviously, but indoors I have no choice. My house has a super open layout (ex no walls between living room, dining room, kitchen, entryway, and bonus room) and unfortunately high ceilings as well. When I try to take photos with the flash directly I obviously get washed out photos. When I bounce the flash with a mirror it comes out just fine, and sometimes with a homemade "diffuser" which I don't use any more (too cumbersome), except that I still have to have a high ISO to get enough light in because my house has so much open space it's almost as bad as trying to bounce the flash off of the sky. lol.
I was at walmart buying a card for my new phone and I noticed they have camera-mounted flash for canon cameras for pretty cheap ($60 ish) They swivel and look like they can be positioned to bounce off the ceiling very powerfully. Right now I literally just tape a small mirror to my pop-up flash that that works for now but obviously I look like a fool and can't use that out in public at places I like to visit like zoos. Are the camera-mounted, cheap external flashes worth it? $60 is not too bad for my wallet but I also am saving up for better lenses so that would come out of my lens fund and I want to make sure I'm not wasting money. I guess my main questions is, is it worth it to not look like a fool in public and will it even work the as bouncing the flash off the ceiling?
Is shooting in "RAW" a large advantage over shooting in large JPEG? What are the actual differences? (I googled a bit and could only deduce that RAW format holds better color and sometimes less noise? ) I really don't do much of any post-processing beyond cropping, re-size, and sometimes rarely color fix or a teeny bit of noise removal but I try to shoot with as low ISO as possible). I really just use my photos for facebook (personal stuff), church events, and sometimes try to help take photos for rescue dogs and other pets and a lot of candid photos so they don't need to be perfect to the pixel, and RAW entails a LOT more work for me. But if it's a big difference I am willing to do it.
I hope this is the right forum for these questions! If not mods please feel free to move it.
Here are some photos I have taken. Lots of animals. Sorry! I just love taking pictures of animals. Things that you see that can specifically be improved on would be appreciated. I have thin skin when it comes to insults but I will take constructive criticism happily.




Last edited: