In defense of B&H, Nikon's stock has been very spotty. I've been watching 4 different lenses over the past couple months and if I was a pro needing pro glass now, I might regret my choice of Nikon.
Thank you. Much appreciated.
henryp, your sharp tongue (via the keyboard) is quite distasteful as a customer relations representative.
We will have to agree to disagree, particularly since my most recent reply was to a base and meritless calumny.
Henry Posner,
I think you misunderstood my comments: the "big name" is you, Henry Posner. I was referring to you, you of the 120-135 photography forum memberships.
I didn't misunderstand a thing. Slow and thick as I may seem to you I did manage to suss that out.
Does B&H have a Nikon D90, a $450 zoom lens, and a lower-tier Nikon flash in stock now, or not?
As you'll see from my links below, the D90 has been and remains unavailable and we do not have any reliable information from Nikon USA about when (or how many) we can expect more. The
SB-400 and
SB-600 are in stock. The
Nikon 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX is too, but at $619.95 may be a bit much under the circumstances. OTOH, the
Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX at 359.95 is worth a look.
My take away from the posts were that this was a camera that he wanted now, not later. Who wants to wait for a camera once they decided what they want...Not me! Heaven knows its not available at B&H. So....really...here's an alternate suggestion if you want to go this route...disingenuous??? Not my take away..
Thank you. Much appreciated.
Henry...care to make a suggestion or two for this guy...you might be the only one right now who has the gumption to...Even if they are not in stock...
The OP wrote his primary considerations were:
"indoor and outdoor portraits or head shots, which is all I'll be using this for at the start."
I think any of us with any experience at this knows there's no one right answer here and the fact that
portraits or head shots can be one person's head-n-shoulders to a small group at full length. That's one advantage, in the OP's situation, for suggesting the zoom rather than a handful of lenses of overlapping focal lengths or ranges. When I was shooting full-time, back in the days of 35mm, my go-to lens for head-n-shoulders portraiture was Nikon's venerable 105/2.5, but that lens was certainly not indicated for most couples or full-lengths, and was IMO better suited to studio than location work where the ambiance contributes to the overall results.
I note later the OP wrote,
"I am on a budget, but would like something that REALLY looks great." Respectfully, I think something that really works great is the higher priority.
So what one lens fits the OP's needs presuming the Rebel T2i (or Nikon D90 which the OP also mentioned)? I think it's worth mentioning the
D90 and
all D90 kits packed by Nikon are and have been unavailable for some time and right now we do not know if inventory will be replenished today or tomorrow or Christmas eve. I'm also bearing in mind the OP said,
"The reason I liked the B&H guy's suggestion was because he claimed the lens he picked would work great for indoors and outdoors and I wouldn't need any other lenses. That's what I want." Earlier, he'd said,
"...I'm not a trained pro with an eye for these things..."
So a relatively inexperienced non-pro wanting to do a variety of work under diverse shooting conditions wants an all-in-one lens with which he can quickly become comfortable.
Canon's EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM remains a reasonable suggestion taking all this into account. I certainly concede it's not the only option and I know full well if you ask three photographers you'll easily end up with four opinions. I wouldn't discount
Sigma's 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM Lens either. Neither of these is inexpensive but both offer the twin benefits of a relatively fast max aperture with a reasonably useful zoom range. The OP said he wanted one lens which, "
would work great for indoors and outdoors."
I am sure there are as many opinions about this as there are people participating in this thread. I am equally sure there are other valid suggestions to be had and I am confident it's possible to continue this conversation with collegiality, basing our comments on the OP's individual situation and our collective experience owning and using the equipment without resorting to name-calling, and baseless accusations of profiteering or piracy.