pocketshaver
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- May 5, 2019
- Messages
- 214
- Reaction score
- 23
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Are the Sekonic analog meters a better option for casual use then the 3-500 dollar digital ones?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You can get a good light meter for a cell phone. I had one called light meter ( imagine that!) For iPhone a few years ago, and it was as accurate as my Minolta flash meter. I compared the two side-by-side on multiple occasions, and it was super accurate and allowed me to actually snap a photo of a scene and to save it along with exposure readings, something that no light meter that I know of can do.
If all you want to do is get an accurate idea of the correct exposure, then you can get it online at the App Store for free or for as little as $1.99 and have it in three minutes. Provided of course that you have a cell phone. Otherwise spend $150 for a light meter that uses the same technology but which can do nothing else but take light meter readings and of course make you look cool when you wear it around your neck.
KIA as good as Mercedes? bwwaaaaahaaaaahhaaaaaaaaa laughed so hard I almost peed my pants.Oh by the way the iPhone is crap. $89 Android phones are all you will need. If you want a computer for internet use then spend $349 on a Chromebook. It is just as good as the MacBook Pro. A Kia is just as good a car as a Mercedes Benz.
You might not have realized that Derrel's post was sarcasm.KIA as good as Mercedes? bwwaaaaahaaaaahhaaaaaaaaa laughed so hard I almost peed my pants.
A Kia is just as good a car as a Mercedes Benz.
I tried several (hence my comment about "experiences vary"), and given the plethora of them available, it's unlikely that they were the same ones you tried, and even more unlikely that we tried them out under even remotely similar conditions. I found them all lacking. While I don't dispute that the hardware is far more sophisticated, it's also not hardware which was purpose-built with the intent of measuring light intensity.What does a proper light meter do? A typical iPhone is a much more sophisticated instrument than a Sekonic or Gossen or Minolta standard ambient light meter. As I said the light meter application that they had for the iPhone 4 worked as well as my Minolta meter which is a roughly $500 instrument and it was a free app.
I have mentioned it several times here before on TPF and every time is has been met withn sarcasm and smart ass disagreements from people who have never even used one.
Not sure I see the relevance. I use both an iPhone and an iPad and like them both. I use a Windows-based computer, but I have nothing against the Macintosh OS.Kind of like people who badmouth the iPhone and the Macintosh platform but have never used either.
Limited experience perhaps, "no experience" isn't quite accurate. I would hope Derrel that you would agree that there is more than one way / type of hand-held meter. Specifically: Incident, reflected, spot and flash. Given that the use of hand-held meters is almost non-existent these days, I don't think it was unreasonable of me to try and determine exactly what the OP had in mind.I understand where the naysayer sentiment is coming from... from a point of no experience with the product that you are disparaging . The OP asked about a light meter, not about a flash meter or a combination meter, but the analog Sekonic versus versus digital readout light meters .
I honestly don't recall if there is an analog Sekonic; I know my Luna Pro F does an excellent job of flash metering...The analog style Sekonic which as you probably know is not a Flash Reader but an incident and reflected meter has its roots in the Eisenhower era.
I don't see it that way at all. My response to the OP suggested two courses of action: (1) if he thought this was likely just a passing fancy or a "how does that work", than the telephone "app" was a good route, but if he thought this was something he wanted to use extensively, than a proper, purpose-built light meter was the way to go. I'm a believer in tools that do too many things do none of them well. I prefer [in most cases] single-purpose tools rather than a Swiss Army Knife. YMMV.I kind of smile when I hear people bad-mouthing light meter application support for handheld computers, which is, surprise! what today's modern cell phone is . This " danger Will Robinson" attitude is kind of like old timers who bad-mouthed the new color TV technology back in the 1960 . Kind of like the Nikon diehards who ridiculed autofocus when it was introduced. Yeah that's right, auto focus was met with ridicule and skepticism when Nikon introduced its autofocus cameras.
Go ahead, stick with Eisenhower era technology. Buy a tool which is 50 years old in its design and 75 years old or more in its idea. Ignore what the new application can easily do far better than any light meter ever made, which is to take snapshots of a scene and teach you by photographs what the exact lighting condition looks like and what the recommend exposure is.
Why indeed?Why buy a microwave when there is a perfectly good tea kettle in the house?