Gosh! What was I thinking... Sorry for my misguidance!
<Sacarstic mode : /ON>
I agree with the others; skip all the technical stuff, you don't need that crap at all. You like taking pictures? Well, take pictures! Fill up your computer with zillions of pictures! Have fun, enjoy the hobby, and since learning is so boring and old fashion, don't be hard on yourself if you don't need to! Why make any efforts when there are so many automatic modes on modern cameras taking care of that for ya? You need a camera? Oh, well, take your phone, or buy any camera that fits your budget or your... purse. Don't get into any technical stuff just yet, as it will kill your creativity and your ability to "see". Sorry, you can't do both at the same time as it's impossible for our brains. Happily join that ever increasing crowd of people who purchased great cameras, but just can't use them outside full AUTO mode.
<Sacarstic mode : /OFF>
All right, back to Earth now... While you may manage to make some good pictures in full auto mode, more often that not, you'll need to use your camera in manual mode so this is where your basic photography knowledge will come into play. You have the choice to learn it before, or afterwards. I guess everyone is different, but I don't know which is more depressing : Investing one hour of your time to learn the core basics of photography that will unlock your hability to correctly expose pictures, or spend countless hours taking pictures for which you have no clue, no control, and end up wondering what went wrong on most of them. I'm guessing that for some here, the deception of reviewing missed shots after missed shots will be the greatest incentive to get serious and do it right.
Seriously, just as you can walk and chew gum at the same time, you can learn the basics of photography
AND learn how to "see" at the same time. One does not exclude the other. I remember when I learned photography some 30+ years ago, I read the book "The Complete Encyclopeadia of Photography" by Michael Langford. This book has been instrumental in helping me to learn how to see with numerous examples. I liked the fact that it was split into small topics of a 1-2-3 pages long covering specific subjects (light direction, light quality, surfaces, textures, contrast, tonal range, reflection, shadows, shapes, mass, colors, expressions, composition, framing, point of view, structure, depth of field, movement, etc). I would then go out and practice the topics I was more interested in until I nailed it. It didn't take long that I developped that photographic eye and images were quickly shaping up in my head, but I had the knowledge to make them happen as I was envisioning them in my head. This is being a photographer. If you don't know what you are doing, you're not a photographer, but you're just taking a picture. There's a world of differences between these two!
Just an analogy with astronomy... Beginners always want to know which telescope they need to buy to start into the hobby, but the best advice they can get is to buy a 10$
star finder and learn how to locate themselves in the night sky. Most of them don't go beyond this step and give up. Total expense : 10$ For those who start with a telescope first, they quickly realize it's useless because they can't locate themselves in the night sky, and they have no clue what they are looking at. The telescope get used once or twice and end up in the closet. Total cost : hundreds if not a couple thousands of dollars. Smart! And for those who learned how to find the stars they are looking for, they soon realize they needed a different telescope...
Do it right the first time. Get the knowledge first, and you will know which gear to buy. Knowledge is cheap, but gear is expensive. It's much easier on the wallet to trow away a book than expensive gear...
Good luck!