invisible said:Number 1 is a big winner. Absolutely love the mood. I would've processed it differently and that would've been so wrong.
JAC526 said:Wonderful....just learned new insult.
Thank you. Btw the first shot is great. I would print it.
If fact if you print it I'll hang it on my wall...hahahah.
It's been a full 25 years since I developed a photo myself. I was really thinking in digital terms, and basically meaning a more contrasty image. What you did is spot on, whatever it was.invisible said:Number 1 is a big winner. Absolutely love the mood. I would've processed it differently and that would've been so wrong.
Thanks but what chemicals would you have processed it with because it has only been sharpened a bit
invisible said:It's been a full 25 years since I developed a photo myself. I was really thinking in digital terms, and basically meaning a more contrasty image. What you did is spot on, whatever it was.
Exactly my point!#2 does it for me.I pray no one steps in and says anything about the horizon line (yawn). Nice work; what else do you want from decades-old film? :razz:
Cheers, but horizon in 2 should not be straight we are up in the hills
terri said:Exactly my point!Sometimes people erroneously point at horizon lines in hills - they're not looking.
Congrats on your pending darkroom. The one we're discussing has great potential as a print, a little bit of dilute bleach on the foreground could make those grasses sparkle.![]()
Ho ho ! You gonna be in need of much more, then 1 100' roll of HP5+ per year.my son is going in the army soon so his room will be turned into a darkroom so i can wet print thats where any processing will be done
Ho ho ! You gonna be in need of much more, then 1 100' roll of HP5+ per year.
Beautiful. The first picture is especially gorgeous. Really do love it.
More likely, film is contagious.Ho ho ! You gonna be in need of much more, then 1 100' roll of HP5+ per year.
In the Sumer it could be 1 100' roll per month
More likely, film is contagious.