bribrius
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2014
- Messages
- 8,708
- Reaction score
- 1,312
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
- Banned
- #16
Oh
Oh there is more violence against women i think. But in 1940 there wasnt women that would cheat on you with your friends kick your dog take all your money and smash the windows out of your car. And then expect to take no accountability for it.The first law against domestic violence was passed in 1850. It wasn't until 1920 that the last state passed a law to make it illegal for a man to beat his wife. That was less than 100 years ago.
Even after laws were passed, arrests were rarely made. It wasn't until the 1970s that people finally stopped turning a blind eye. There were more laws starting in the 1990s that had more teeth and could actually protect women, not only because of consequences but because they were actually being enforced.
So just think - is there really more violence against women? Or is it just more visible now because a) it is FINALLY less acceptable, which in turn means there's more social stigma and more consequences, and so women feel safer to report the abuse, and b) there are more ways to capture photographic evidence of the abuse.
(And yet, just think of all the abuse that still does NOT get reported.)
This is not about men 'losing their place' - abuse is about insecurity, fear, and control. And quite frankly, I feel it is problem to imply that if we could all just appreciate what men do, then they won't beat us anymore. That's dancing dangerously close to the victim-blaming line.
Why can't a man be appreciated for being good to his family? Good question. Why can't a woman be appreciated for what she does for her family? Why can't men AND women both be appreciated for the good things they do even if they don't have families? These are also good questions. I just don't think they are the relevant questions to ask when the subject is domestic violence.
