What's new

My Home Studio

This one also.
If you aren't using a calibrated monitor, you really have no idea how bright or color correct your images are.
IMG_3364-1-3llllllllll.webp
 
That's a "Double Like" Lew.

Please bear that in mind when you make Moderator.
 
That's a "Double Like" Lew.

Please bear that in mind when you make Moderator.

My guess is that when Terry (the Queen Moderator) saw that last line, she started to laugh.
If you knew how many times, I've been on the brink of banishment for being unpleasant, you would laugh also.
 
Asof (?)

First your children are just beautiful - and good models.

It is very easy to have a white balance that is off and have light a little too strong with children. They don't have too much color in their skin and, without looking carefully, we can let the picture be too cool.

I made this a bit warmer and increased the red saturation a bit so the baby's skin loses that bluish cast overall and there is nice contrast with the color of his shirt.


babylllll.webp
 
Thanks for the comparison
ya, i learned the hard way about the f2.8 and the narrow a DOF.
I will increase the ISO to 400/800 to see the difference. .
my problem with the WB is that i'm trying to fix it in Lightroom and its ok, but its give me a warmer background instead the white.

in this photo i increase a bit the exposure, I'm trying to get the sweet spot, So which one's better?
I like the second, but in the 1st there is more details.
44.webp
 
I'm glad I came to this thread because my strobes should be here soon, and I will be making the same mistakes you are :-)

I would be using somewhat of a lower aperture f/4 + to get those hands in focus, but let me iterate that I am no professional and learning myself. So don't take my advice too seriously :-)
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom