My puggle

[birdbonkers84]

Jeffrey April 2017 by Mark Coull, on Flickr

Apparently my auto ISO decided it need 8063 to get this shot lol

 

[Derrel]

Pretty good for ISO 8,063, right?!

 

[birdbonkers84]

Pretty good for ISO 8,063, right?!

Still scratching my head at why it needed such a high ISO, didn't think the lighting was that bad!?

 

[goooner]

Very good for ISO 8000. Was this shot in RAW or JPEG. I still can't match my camera JPEGs on noise reduction, sharpness. Still lots to learn....

 

[birdbonkers84]

Very good for ISO 8000. Was this shot in RAW or JPEG. I still can't match my camera JPEGs on noise reduction, sharpness. Still lots to learn....

Shot in raw on my Tamron 150-600, was in a park with him trying to get some action pug shots as he was running around with a stick. Only editing i've done to this in LR is adjustment layer removing noise (so I don't lose detail), sharpening of his eyes and WB. Been reading up more on exposure compensation, something I really need to try!

 

[Derrel]

Very good for ISO 8000. Was this shot in RAW or JPEG. I still can't match my camera JPEGs on noise reduction, sharpness. Still lots to learn....

Yeahz I know what you mean: some of the new cameras have very good NR and processing of images. Very smart indoor, low light processing, very similar to how I would process by hand in Lightroom.