Great subject but you went to heavy on the tone mapping. The best HDRs are the images that dont look HDR.
Thanks. And although I appreciate your comment I have to disagree. It is all based off of personal taste. Not what is BEST! Like
tirediron said it's a bit much for his taste but he never said what is best when it comes to artistic vision. That is a bit much. And in my defense I did state above that I was enjoying the surreal side of HDR in this endeavor.
Artistically, any limitation on art degrades the art itself. There are film photographers out there that are hardcore old school about using an old 35mm camera and a darkroom and would say that any good photographer is one that uses real film and not digital. I have books and links to a dozen web sites of HDR photographers that are considered the top of the crop and they have MANY photos that 'look HDR' by your statement. There is the HDR realistic, focused on more contrast and detail and there are those that use the detail enhancer provided by Photomatix...if you disagree then that is your opinion but there are hundreds if not thousands of incredible hdr artwork using a slightly if not over the top surreal effect.
Browse around these galleries and open your mind
HDR tone mapped or exposure blended photos from Photomatix users
As each new technology/art comes about you have those that want to tame it and put limitations on its potential based off their own experience or limitations.
As an artist I know that pushing boundaries is all that interests me. I do appreciate you response but again any limitations on art or any boundaries set on art irritates me. I know there are rules but some of the best things in music, painting, photography has come from someone breaking the rules and trying something different.
Off the podium. And so it goes...
Have a good night folks and thanks for looking at my stuff!
