Ahh... I don't know if I'd compare them that way. The 35 is a really nice for perspective for getting a clear subject with some background too, and a fast 35 helps separate that subject. I find that most of my photos at that length though have an obvious subject to the photo. My wide is really an ultra-wide, and I think of that more for "scenes" than "subjects", if you know what I mean. If I'm shooting that wide then I'm trying to capture a lot of area, or trying to exaggerate perspective. I've gotten some portraits at 16mm, but they're more effect-y than anything else. Eventually I'd like to get something around 21 or 24, to find a happy medium. Long enough to isolate a subject, but wide enough to still include a lot of scene.