bc_steve
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2013
- Messages
- 1,384
- Reaction score
- 622
- Location
- British Columbia, Canada
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
They make a 35mm f1.8 for FX bodies, I'm sure it is better
They make a 35mm f1.8 for FX bodies, I'm sure it is better
I could be easily tempted to sell my Canon gear for this newer technology. Just sayin'.
I could be easily tempted to sell my Canon gear for this newer technology. Just sayin'.
Go Nikon!
I could be easily tempted to sell my Canon gear for this newer technology. Just sayin'.
Go Nikon!
If I can find any talent soon, I'll mull on it some more.
I used D80 before D7000 two years ago and I saw a huge difference. Upgrade from D7000 to D810 will see the similar difference. You will be pleasantly surprised.
By the way you will have your hands and arms work out if you attach a heavy lens to it and shoot it all day.
AND you get multiple exposure and an intervalometer feature in every Nikon camera !! :lmao:I could be easily tempted to sell my Canon gear for this newer technology. Just sayin'.
Back to the OP. I've danced around with upgrading from my D7000 too but, I just haven't seen anything that is going to give me enough improvement in IQ and fun to be worth the trouble. When I bought the D7000 I was coming from an 8mp Sony F828. The improvement at ISO 400 and beyond was profound. I personally don't need more than 16mp. and I don't need full frame. When Nikon makes a crop frame that dramatically ups the usable ISO I'll probably jump on it.
Cool..Thanks!
I used D80 before D7000 two years ago and I saw a huge difference. Upgrade from D7000 to D810 will see the similar difference. You will be pleasantly surprised.
By the way you will have your hands and arms work out if you attach a heavy lens to it and shoot it all day.