The original photos all seemed kind of small, and faraway...plus the LIGHTING seems rather overcast and visually dull. Without much in the way of shadows, the guy and the hoop do not stand out very much...the LIGHTING was really,really working against you when these pictures were shot. I think had the lighting been strong, and directional, with a good, solid shadow, it would have really helped these. With that type of diffused, overcast light however, the BACKGROUND subjects, like the apartment building and the houses, all have pretty much equal weight, visually. With no "anchor shadow" for the man, he's just sort of "there". I actually "get" what you were trying to achieve here, and my honest feeling is that the LIGHTING is a huge part of the problem.